It goes without saying, but it is probably better to spell it out:
If userspace tries to restore and VM, but creates vcpus and/or RDs
in a different order, the vcpu/RD mapping will be different. Yes,
our API is an ugly piece of crap and I can't believe that we missed
this.
If we want to relax the above, we'll need to define a new userspace
API that allows the mapping to be specified, rather than relying
on the kernel to perform the mapping on its own.
Reviewed-by: Zenghui Yu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <[email protected]>
It is invalid to mix calls with KVM_VGIC_V3_ADDR_TYPE_REDIST and
KVM_VGIC_V3_ADDR_TYPE_REDIST_REGION attributes.
+ Note that to obtain reproducible results (the same VCPU being associated
+ with the same redistributor across a save/restore operation), VCPU creation
+ order, redistributor region creation order as well as the respective
+ interleaves of VCPU and region creation MUST be preserved. Any change in
+ either ordering may result in a different vcpu_id/redistributor association,
+ resulting in a VM that will fail to run at restore time.
+
Errors:
======= =============================================================