Contrary to i915, in xe ADL-N is kept as a different platform, not a
subplatform of ADL-P. Since the display side doesn't need to
differentiate between P and N, i.e. IS_ALDERLAKE_P_N() is never called,
just fixup the compat header to check for both P and N.
Moving ADL-N to be a subplatform would be more complex as the firmware
loading in xe only handles platforms, not subplatforms, as going forward
the direction is to check on IP version rather than
platforms/subplatforms.
Fix warning when initializing display:
xe 0000:00:02.0: [drm:intel_pch_type [xe]] Found Alder Lake PCH
------------[ cut here ]------------
xe 0000:00:02.0: drm_WARN_ON(!((dev_priv)->info.platform == XE_ALDERLAKE_S) && !((dev_priv)->info.platform == XE_ALDERLAKE_P))
And wrong paths being taken on the display side.
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit
6a2a90cba12b42eb96c2af3426b77ceb4be31df2)
Fixes: 44e694958b95 ("drm/xe/display: Implement display support")
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <[email protected]>
#define IS_ROCKETLAKE(dev_priv) IS_PLATFORM(dev_priv, XE_ROCKETLAKE)
#define IS_DG1(dev_priv) IS_PLATFORM(dev_priv, XE_DG1)
#define IS_ALDERLAKE_S(dev_priv) IS_PLATFORM(dev_priv, XE_ALDERLAKE_S)
-#define IS_ALDERLAKE_P(dev_priv) IS_PLATFORM(dev_priv, XE_ALDERLAKE_P)
+#define IS_ALDERLAKE_P(dev_priv) (IS_PLATFORM(dev_priv, XE_ALDERLAKE_P) || \
+ IS_PLATFORM(dev_priv, XE_ALDERLAKE_N))
#define IS_XEHPSDV(dev_priv) (dev_priv && 0)
#define IS_DG2(dev_priv) IS_PLATFORM(dev_priv, XE_DG2)
#define IS_PONTEVECCHIO(dev_priv) IS_PLATFORM(dev_priv, XE_PVC)