GCC 4.9 seems to have a problem with the "S" asm constraint
when the symbol lives in the same compilation unit, and pretends
the constraint is impossible:
$ cat x.c
void *foo(void)
{
static int x;
int *addr;
asm("adrp %0, %1" : "=r" (addr) : "S" (&x));
return addr;
}
$ ~/Work/gcc-linaro-aarch64-linux-gnu-4.9-2014.09_linux/bin/aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc -S -x c -O2 x.c
x.c: In function ‘foo’:
x.c:5:2: error: impossible constraint in ‘asm’
asm("adrp %0, %1" : "=r" (addr) : "S" (&x));
^
Boo. Following revisions of the compiler work just fine, though.
We can fallback to the "i" constraint for GCC version prior to 5.0,
which *seems* to do the right thing. Hopefully we will be able to
remove this at some point, but in the meantime this gets us going.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>
extern char __smccc_workaround_1_smc[__SMCCC_WORKAROUND_1_SMC_SZ];
+#if defined(GCC_VERSION) && GCC_VERSION < 50000
+#define SYM_CONSTRAINT "i"
+#else
+#define SYM_CONSTRAINT "S"
+#endif
+
/*
* Obtain the PC-relative address of a kernel symbol
* s: symbol
typeof(s) *addr; \
asm("adrp %0, %1\n" \
"add %0, %0, :lo12:%1\n" \
- : "=r" (addr) : "S" (&s)); \
+ : "=r" (addr) : SYM_CONSTRAINT (&s)); \
addr; \
})