x86/timer: Don't inline __const_udelay()

LTO will happily inline __const_udelay() everywhere it is used.  Forcing it
noinline saves ~44k text in a LTO build.

13999560        1740864 1499136 17239560        1070e08 vmlinux-with-udelay-inline
13954764        1736768 1499136 17190668        1064f0c vmlinux-wo-udelay-inline

Even without LTO this function should never be inlined.

Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]

diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/delay.c b/arch/x86/lib/delay.c
index f5b7f1b3b6d75ce6024f7ab7459586b1f124902d..b7375dc6898f3215966359a2de29a6b8fc9ce592 100644 (file)
--- a/arch/x86/lib/delay.c
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/delay.c
@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ void __delay(unsigned long loops)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__delay);
 
-void __const_udelay(unsigned long xloops)
+noinline void __const_udelay(unsigned long xloops)
 {
        unsigned long lpj = this_cpu_read(cpu_info.loops_per_jiffy) ? : loops_per_jiffy;
        int d0;