tty: tty_ldisc: Fix coding style issues of block comments

Fix coding style issues of block comments, reported by checkpatch.pl.

Signed-off-by: Xiaofei Tan <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c b/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c
index df0b58905eb79d5f5dffec801765202602359a89..874d238236e6c1442d27e697b269f5069daaf66a 100644 (file)
--- a/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c
@@ -529,9 +529,11 @@ static void tty_ldisc_restore(struct tty_struct *tty, struct tty_ldisc *old)
                const char *name = tty_name(tty);
 
                pr_warn("Falling back ldisc for %s.\n", name);
-               /* The traditional behaviour is to fall back to N_TTY, we
-                  want to avoid falling back to N_NULL unless we have no
-                  choice to avoid the risk of breaking anything */
+               /*
+                * The traditional behaviour is to fall back to N_TTY, we
+                * want to avoid falling back to N_NULL unless we have no
+                * choice to avoid the risk of breaking anything
+                */
                if (tty_ldisc_failto(tty, N_TTY) < 0 &&
                    tty_ldisc_failto(tty, N_NULL) < 0)
                        panic("Couldn't open N_NULL ldisc for %s.", name);
@@ -600,17 +602,21 @@ int tty_set_ldisc(struct tty_struct *tty, int disc)
                up_read(&tty->termios_rwsem);
        }
 
-       /* At this point we hold a reference to the new ldisc and a
-          reference to the old ldisc, or we hold two references to
-          the old ldisc (if it was restored as part of error cleanup
-          above). In either case, releasing a single reference from
-          the old ldisc is correct. */
+       /*
+        * At this point we hold a reference to the new ldisc and a
+        * reference to the old ldisc, or we hold two references to
+        * the old ldisc (if it was restored as part of error cleanup
+        * above). In either case, releasing a single reference from
+        * the old ldisc is correct.
+        */
        new_ldisc = old_ldisc;
 out:
        tty_ldisc_unlock(tty);
 
-       /* Restart the work queue in case no characters kick it off. Safe if
-          already running */
+       /*
+        * Restart the work queue in case no characters kick it off. Safe if
+        * already running
+        */
        tty_buffer_restart_work(tty->port);
 err:
        tty_ldisc_put(new_ldisc);       /* drop the extra reference */
@@ -812,8 +818,10 @@ void tty_ldisc_release(struct tty_struct *tty)
                tty_ldisc_kill(o_tty);
        tty_ldisc_unlock_pair(tty, o_tty);
 
-       /* And the memory resources remaining (buffers, termios) will be
-          disposed of when the kref hits zero */
+       /*
+        * And the memory resources remaining (buffers, termios) will be
+        * disposed of when the kref hits zero
+        */
 
        tty_ldisc_debug(tty, "released\n");
 }