The current codebase makes use of one-element arrays in the following
form:
struct something {
int length;
u8 data[1];
};
struct something *instance;
instance = kmalloc(sizeof(*instance) + size, GFP_KERNEL);
instance->length = size;
memcpy(instance->data, source, size);
but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as
these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. So, replace
the one-element array with a flexible-array member.
Also, make use of the new struct_size() helper to properly calculate the
size of struct qe_firmware.
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle and, audited and fixed
_manually_.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit
76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Qiang Zhao <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Li Yang <[email protected]>
unsigned int i;
unsigned int j;
u32 crc;
- size_t calc_size = sizeof(struct qe_firmware);
+ size_t calc_size;
size_t length;
const struct qe_header *hdr;
}
/* Validate the length and check if there's a CRC */
- calc_size += (firmware->count - 1) * sizeof(struct qe_microcode);
+ calc_size = struct_size(firmware, microcode, firmware->count);
for (i = 0; i < firmware->count; i++)
/*
u8 revision; /* The microcode version revision */
u8 padding; /* Reserved, for alignment */
u8 reserved[4]; /* Reserved, for future expansion */
- } __attribute__ ((packed)) microcode[1];
+ } __packed microcode[];
/* All microcode binaries should be located here */
/* CRC32 should be located here, after the microcode binaries */
} __attribute__ ((packed));