drivers/leds/leds-ot200.c: fix error caused by shifted mask

During the development of this driver an in-house register documentation
was used.  The last week some integration tests were done and this
problem was found.  It turned out that the released register
documentation is wrong.

The fix is very simple: shift all masks by one.

Signed-off-by: Christian Gmeiner <[email protected]>
Cc: Bryan Wu <[email protected]>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>

diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-ot200.c b/drivers/leds/leds-ot200.c
index ee14662ed5cef46b845aeeb3557e55dcd6580efb..98cae529373f44aa202a1a5c0f9d2f2259ab0e98 100644 (file)
--- a/drivers/leds/leds-ot200.c
+++ b/drivers/leds/leds-ot200.c
@@ -47,37 +47,37 @@ static struct ot200_led leds[] = {
        {
                .name = "led_1",
                .port = 0x49,
-               .mask = BIT(7),
+               .mask = BIT(6),
        },
        {
                .name = "led_2",
                .port = 0x49,
-               .mask = BIT(6),
+               .mask = BIT(5),
        },
        {
                .name = "led_3",
                .port = 0x49,
-               .mask = BIT(5),
+               .mask = BIT(4),
        },
        {
                .name = "led_4",
                .port = 0x49,
-               .mask = BIT(4),
+               .mask = BIT(3),
        },
        {
                .name = "led_5",
                .port = 0x49,
-               .mask = BIT(3),
+               .mask = BIT(2),
        },
        {
                .name = "led_6",
                .port = 0x49,
-               .mask = BIT(2),
+               .mask = BIT(1),
        },
        {
                .name = "led_7",
                .port = 0x49,
-               .mask = BIT(1),
+               .mask = BIT(0),
        }
 };