The afs_net::ws_cell member is sometimes used under RCU conditions from
within an seq-readlock. It isn't, however, marked __rcu and it isn't set
using the proper RCU barrier-imposing functions.
Fix this by annotating it with __rcu and using appropriate barriers to
make sure accesses are correctly ordered.
Without this, the code can produce the following warning:
>> fs/afs/proc.c:151:24: sparse: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces)
Fixes: f044c8847bb6 ("afs: Lay the groundwork for supporting network namespaces")
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <[email protected]>
/* install the new cell */
write_seqlock(&net->cells_lock);
- old_root = net->ws_cell;
- net->ws_cell = new_root;
+ old_root = rcu_access_pointer(net->ws_cell);
+ rcu_assign_pointer(net->ws_cell, new_root);
write_sequnlock(&net->cells_lock);
afs_put_cell(net, old_root);
_enter("");
write_seqlock(&net->cells_lock);
- ws = net->ws_cell;
- net->ws_cell = NULL;
+ ws = rcu_access_pointer(net->ws_cell);
+ RCU_INIT_POINTER(net->ws_cell, NULL);
write_sequnlock(&net->cells_lock);
afs_put_cell(net, ws);
/* Cell database */
struct rb_root cells;
- struct afs_cell *ws_cell;
+ struct afs_cell __rcu *ws_cell;
struct work_struct cells_manager;
struct timer_list cells_timer;
atomic_t cells_outstanding;
if (*_pos > 0)
return 0;
- if (!net->ws_cell)
+ if (!rcu_access_pointer(net->ws_cell))
return 0;
rcu_read_lock();