utils/check-package: don't ignore check-package

Commit 32934b526b64 (utils/checkpackagelib: check for Upstream trailers)
introduced a new python module to check Upstream tags in patch files. In
doing so, it introduced a flake8 coding style issue. That was not caught
when applying the change, and neither was it caught by our daily checks,
because the .checkpackagefile was regenerated right just in the next
commit, to apply ignore patterns to existing patch files.

It is a bit sad that one of our checks does not itself passes all our
checks...

Fix that trivial issue now.

Signed-off-by: Yann E. MORIN <[email protected]>

diff --git a/.checkpackageignore b/.checkpackageignore
index b7d45df2a244cf198fbbcf0eaa46d5559f87aece..6f8d37feefca45e70975ff70367f87cb42eceb9f 100644 (file)
--- a/.checkpackageignore
+++ b/.checkpackageignore
@@ -1462,4 +1462,3 @@ support/scripts/setlocalversion Shellcheck
 support/testing/tests/core/post-build.sh Shellcheck
 support/testing/tests/package/test_opkg/post-build.sh Shellcheck
 support/testing/tests/utils/test_get_developers/0001-package-binutils-change-.mk.patch NumberedSubject Upstream
-utils/checkpackagelib/lib_patch.py Flake8

diff --git a/utils/checkpackagelib/lib_patch.py b/utils/checkpackagelib/lib_patch.py
index 1909d3acd063800345b9e040c05b74bb3a05b96c..b01d28a7e72a487e427a17cc17bce3f0db4d58a2 100644 (file)
--- a/utils/checkpackagelib/lib_patch.py
+++ b/utils/checkpackagelib/lib_patch.py
@@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ class Sob(_CheckFunction):
                     "({}#_format_and_licensing_of_the_package_patches)"
                     .format(self.filename, self.url_to_manual)]
 
+
 class Upstream(_CheckFunction):
     UPSTREAM_ENTRY = re.compile(r"^Upstream: .*$")