The message "ACPI: Device needs an ACPI driver" is misleading. The
device _may_ need an ACPI driver, if the BIOS implemented a custom
API for the device in question (which, AFAIK, can't be checked.) If
not, then either a generic ACPI driver may be used (for example
"thermal"), or nothing can be done (other than a white list).
I propose to reword the message to:
ACPI: If an ACPI driver is available for this device, you should use
it instead of the native driver
which I think is more correct. Comments and suggestions welcome.
I also added a message warning about possible problems and system
instability when users pass acpi_enforce_resources=lax, as suggested
by Len.
Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Renninger <[email protected]>
Cc: Alan Jenkins <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <[email protected]>
res_list_elem->name,
(long long) res_list_elem->start,
(long long) res_list_elem->end);
- printk(KERN_INFO "ACPI: Device needs an ACPI driver\n");
+ if (acpi_enforce_resources == ENFORCE_RESOURCES_LAX)
+ printk(KERN_NOTICE "ACPI: This conflict may"
+ " cause random problems and system"
+ " instability\n");
+ printk(KERN_INFO "ACPI: If an ACPI driver is available"
+ " for this device, you should use it instead of"
+ " the native driver\n");
}
if (acpi_enforce_resources == ENFORCE_RESOURCES_STRICT)
return -EBUSY;