From: Marc-André Lureau Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 18:18:10 +0000 (+0100) Subject: checkpatch: volatile with a comment or sig_atomic_t is okay X-Git-Url: https://repo.jachan.dev/qemu.git/commitdiff_plain/6b012d2311e5ba0a952c2dcfe4327a73353c9fdb checkpatch: volatile with a comment or sig_atomic_t is okay This assumes that the comment gives some justification; "volatile sig_atomic_t" is also self-explanatory and usually correct. Discussed in: '[Qemu-devel] [PATCH] dump-guest-memory.py: fix "You can't do that without a process to debug"' Suggested-by: Fam Zheng Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau Message-Id: <20171215181810.4122-1-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini --- diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl index 34df753571..3dc27d9656 100755 --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl @@ -2475,8 +2475,11 @@ sub process { # no volatiles please my $asm_volatile = qr{\b(__asm__|asm)\s+(__volatile__|volatile)\b}; - if ($line =~ /\bvolatile\b/ && $line !~ /$asm_volatile/) { - ERROR("Use of volatile is usually wrong: see Documentation/volatile-considered-harmful.txt\n" . $herecurr); + if ($line =~ /\bvolatile\b/ && $line !~ /$asm_volatile/ && + $line !~ /sig_atomic_t/ && + !ctx_has_comment($first_line, $linenr)) { + my $msg = "Use of volatile is usually wrong, please add a comment\n" . $herecurr; + ERROR($msg); } # warn about #if 0