Lucas De Marchi [Tue, 5 Apr 2022 00:11:49 +0000 (17:11 -0700)]
drm/i915/uncore: Warn on previous unclaimed accesses
Since gen6 we use FPGA_DBG register to detect unclaimed MMIO registers.
This register is in the display engine IP and can only ever detect
unclaimed accesses to registers in this area. However sometimes there
are reports of this triggering for registers in other areas, which
should not be possible.
Right now we always warn after the read/write of registers going through
unclaimed_reg_debug(). However places using __raw_uncore_* may be
triggering the unclaimed access and those being later accounted to a
different register. Let's warn both before and after the read/write
with a slightly different message, so it's clear if the register
reported in the warning is actually the culprit.
Commit dda960335e02 ("drm/i915: Just clear the mmiodebug before a
register access") attempted to solve the same issue by removing the
warning when if FPGA_DBG flags before the mmio read/write. However, it
doesn't solve it completely as FPGA_DBG may remain set when reading
registers outside display. So in the end the check after the mmio
read/write triggers the warning pointing to the wrong register.
Imre Deak [Wed, 23 Mar 2022 20:17:49 +0000 (22:17 +0200)]
drm/i915/adlp: Fix register corruption after DDI clock enabling
Accessing the DDI_BUF_CTL register without the port's DDI clock being
enabled (to set/clear the TypeC PHY ownership for the port) can lead to
a corrupted value read during any i915 register access right after the
DDI clock is enabled.
The root cause is the way clock synchronization works for this register,
controlled by the CHICKEN_DCPR_1 DDI_CLOCK_REG_ACCESS flag. Correctly
this flag should be cleared on ADLP (see the Bspec link below), however
after bootup the flag is set.
One easily reproducible issue is an unclaimed register access of the
PWR_WELL_CTL_DDI2 register, programmed right after DDI clock enabling to
enable the port's DDI_IO power well (see the HSDES, VLK links below).
With the correct setting above this problem can't be reproduced.
drm/i915/display/psr: Use continuos full frame to handle frontbuffer invalidations
Instead of exit PSR when a frontbuffer invalidation happens, we can
enable the PSR2 selective fetch continuous full frame, that will keep
the panel updated like PSR was disabled but without keeping PSR active.
So as soon as the frontbuffer flush happens we can disable the
continuous full frame and start to do selective fetches much quicker
than the path that would enable PSR, that will wait a few frames
to actually activate PSR.
Also this approach has proven to fix some glitches found in Alderlake-P
when there are a lot of invalidations happening together with page
flips.
Some may ask why it is writing to CURSURFLIVE(), it is because
that is the way that hardware team provided us to poke display to
handle PSR updates, and it is being used since display 9.
v2:
- handling possible race conditions between frontbuffer rendering and
page flips
drm/i915/display/psr: Set partial frame enable when forcing full frame fetch
Following up what was done in commit 804f46885317 ("drm/i915/psr: Set
"SF Partial Frame Enable" also on full update") and also setting
partial frame enable when psr_force_hw_tracking_exit() is called.
Also as PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL is a double buffered registers do a RMW
is not a good idea so here also setting the man_trk_ctl_enable_bit()
that is required in TGL and only doing a register write.
v2:
- not doing a rmw
v3:
- removing the inline from functions that return PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL
bits
Ashutosh Dixit [Mon, 14 Mar 2022 16:13:10 +0000 (09:13 -0700)]
drm/i915/pmu: Drop redundant IS_VALLEYVIEW check in __get_rc6()
Because VLV_GT_RENDER_RC6 == GEN6_GT_GFX_RC6, the IS_VALLEYVIEW() check is
not needed. Neither is the check present in other code paths which call
intel_rc6_residency_ns() (in functions gen6_drpc(), rc6_residency() and
rc6_residency_ms_show()).
Animesh Manna [Fri, 25 Mar 2022 16:11:40 +0000 (21:41 +0530)]
drm/i915/dsb: modified to drm_info in dsb_prepare()
The request to aqquire gem resources is failing for DSB in rare
scenario where it is busy and the register programming will be done
through mmio fallback path.
DSB has extra advantage of faster register programming which may
go away through mmio path. Adding wait for gem resource also may
not be right as anyways losing time.
To make the CI execution happy replaced drm_err() to drm_info()
for printing debug info during dsb buffer preparation.
v1: Initial version.
v2: Added print for mmio fallback at out label. [Nirmoy]
v3: Improved debug message. [Nirmoy]
Ville Syrjälä [Tue, 22 Mar 2022 12:00:14 +0000 (14:00 +0200)]
drm/i915/dp: Fix DFP rgb->ycbcr conversion matrix
Our YCbCr output is always supposed to be limited range BT.709.
That's what we send with native HDMI. The conn_state->colorspace
stuff is entirely independent of that and is not supposed to alter
the generated output in any way. If we want a way to do that then
we need a new proprty for it.
Make it so that the RGB->YCbCr conversion when performed by the
DPF will match the BT.709 we would transmit with native HDMI.
With native HDMI we allow the user to override the mode with
something that may not respect the downstream (sink,dual-mode adapter)
TMDS clock limits. Let's reuse the same logic for DP HDMI DFPs
so that behaviour is more or less uniform.
Ville Syrjälä [Tue, 22 Mar 2022 12:00:12 +0000 (14:00 +0200)]
drm/i915/dp: Add support for "4:2:0 also" modes for DP
Currently we only support "4:2:0 also" modes on native HDMI.
Extend that support for DP as well.
With all the HDMI DFP TMDS clock handling sorted out this
is now going to work for both native DP and DP->HDMI
converters. As with native HDMI we first check if RGB
output is possible, and if not we try YCbCr 4:2:0 instead.
Ville Syrjälä [Tue, 22 Mar 2022 12:00:11 +0000 (14:00 +0200)]
drm/i915/dp: Rework HDMI DFP TMDS clock handling
Rework the HDMI DFP TMDS clock checks to also check at 8bpc.
Previously we only checked the deep color cases. But I suppose
a sink could potentially declare "4:2:0 also" modes that only
actually fit within its own limits when using 4:2:0. Even if
that is too nuts to be real there is no real harm in running
through the full checks for everything.
Ville Syrjälä [Tue, 22 Mar 2022 12:00:10 +0000 (14:00 +0200)]
drm/i915/dp: Make intel_dp_output_format() usable for "4:2:0 also" modes
Hoist the drm_mode_is_420_only() from intel_dp_output_format()
into the caller. This will allow intel_dp_output_format() to be
reused for "4:2:0 also" modes.
Ville Syrjälä [Tue, 22 Mar 2022 12:00:08 +0000 (14:00 +0200)]
drm/i915/dp: Reorder intel_dp_compute_config() a bit
Consolidate the double pfit call, and reorder things so that
intel_dp_output_format() and intel_dp_compute_link_config() are
back-to-back. They are intimately related, and will need to be
called twice to properly handle the "4:2:0 also" modes.
Ville Syrjälä [Tue, 22 Mar 2022 12:00:05 +0000 (14:00 +0200)]
drm/i915/dp: Respect the sink's max TMDS clock when dealing with DP->HDMI DFPs
Currently we only look at the DFPs max TMDS clock limit when
considering whether the mode is valid, or whether we can do
deep color. The sink's max TMDS clock limit may be lower than
the DFPs, so we need to account for it as well.
Ville Syrjälä [Thu, 31 Mar 2022 11:28:20 +0000 (14:28 +0300)]
drm/i915: Move intel_drrs_compute_config() into intel_dp.c
intel_drrs_compute_config() is 100% DP specific. DRRS on other
types of encoders wouldn't do any of these M2/N2 calculations
etc. So let's move this into intel_dp.c so all the DP state
calculation is more concentrated into one place.
We shouldn't restrict ourselves to just downclock modes with
lower refresh rate than the preferred mode. Laptops these
days can offer higher refresh rate modes as well.
Remove the arbitrary limit and allow all modes that, apart
from the clock, match the preferred mode.
Ville Syrjälä [Thu, 31 Mar 2022 11:28:17 +0000 (14:28 +0300)]
drm/i915: Stop duplicating the EDID fixed/downclock modes
Instead of duplicating the fixed/downclock modes we can just grab
the originals straight from the probed_modes list and keep them.
The next .get_modes() is going to repopulate the probed_modes list
anyway so whatever we leave there is just going to sit around until
that time wasting memory. In fact let's clear out the probed modes
list entirely to make sure we get 100% consistent behaviour starting
already from the very first real .get_modes().
Ville Syrjälä [Thu, 31 Mar 2022 11:28:16 +0000 (14:28 +0300)]
drm/i915: Combine the EDID fixed_mode+downclock_mode lookup into one
The intel_panel_add_edid_fixed_mode() vs.
intel_panel_add_edid_downclock_mode() split is not really
helpful. Let's just roll those into a single function so
that the connector init code doesn't have to care too much
about this. All we need to know is whether DRRS should be
allowed or not.
Ville Syrjälä [Thu, 31 Mar 2022 11:28:15 +0000 (14:28 +0300)]
drm/i915: Nuke intel_drrs_init()
intel_drrs_init() is a mostly pointless wrapper around
intel_panel_add_edid_downclock_mode(), get rid of it.
The only really useful thing left in there is the debug
print regarding the DRRS type supported by the connector.
Let's just move that into intel_panel_init().
All the non-EDID fixed mode functions basically do the exact
same thing. Let's refactor the common bits into a shared
function.
There are minor differences on how the mode types are populated,
whether the display info physical size is updated, and the debug
print. The differences are purely accidental, so unifying them is
actually a good thing.
Ville Syrjälä [Thu, 31 Mar 2022 11:28:13 +0000 (14:28 +0300)]
drm/i915: Put fixed modes directly onto the panel's fixed_modes list
Rather than having the connector init get the fixed mode back from
intel_panel and then feed it straight back into intel_panel_init()
let's just make the fixed mode lookup put the mode directly onto
the panel's fixed_modes list. Avoids the pointless round trip and
opens the door for further enhancements to the fixed mode handling.
v2: Make the debug message correct by using intel_panel_drrs_type() (Jani)
drm/i915/display/adlp: Fix programing of PIPE_MBUS_DBOX_CTL
PIPE_MBUS_DBOX_CTL was only being programmed when a pipe is being
enabled but that could potentially cause issues as it could have
mismatching values while pipes are being enabled.
So here moving the PIPE_MBUS_DBOX_CTL programming of all pipes to be
executed before the function that enables all pipes, leaving all pipes
with a matching A_CREDIT value.
While at it, also moving it to intel_pm.c as we are trying to reduce
the gigantic size of intel_display.c and intel_pm.c have other MBUS
programing sequences.
v2:
- do not program PIPE_MBUS_DBOX_CTL if pipe will not be active or
when it do not needs modeset
- remove the checks to wait a vblank
v3:
- checking if dbuf state is present in state before using it
drm/i915/display/tgl+: Set default values for all registers in PIPE_MBUS_DBOX_CTL
MBUS_DBOX_B2B_TRANSACTIONS_MAX, MBUS_DBOX_B2B_TRANSACTIONS_DELAY and
MBUS_DBOX_REGULATE_B2B_TRANSACTIONS_EN were being programmed with
zeros while specification has different default values for this
registers in display 12 and newer.
While at it also converting all MBUS_DBOX macros to use REG_* macros.
Jani Nikula [Wed, 30 Mar 2022 09:30:19 +0000 (12:30 +0300)]
drm/i915/dp: make DSC usage logging actually useful
Debug log when DSC is going to be used, and why, instead of
unconditionally logging the rarely used debug option setting, which
might not have any bearing on whether DSC is going to be used or not.
The audio codec enable/disable debug logging is spread around in callers
and the platform specific hooks. Put them all together in one place on
both the enable and disable paths.
intel_dmc_load_program() is only ever called when
intel_dmc_has_payload() is true. Move the condition within
intel_dmc_load_program() to let it be called directly.
Also note that intel_dmc_has_payload() will always return false when
HAS_DMC() is false. Remove the redundant check.
Matt Roper [Tue, 29 Mar 2022 00:08:21 +0000 (17:08 -0700)]
drm/i915/ats-m: add ATS-M platform info
ATS-M is a server platform based on Xe_HPG and Xe_HPM, but without
display support. From a driver point of view, it's easiest to just
handle it as DG2 (including identifying as PLATFORM_DG2), but with the
display disabled in the device info.
Ville Syrjälä [Wed, 23 Mar 2022 18:29:35 +0000 (20:29 +0200)]
drm/i915: Change SDVO fixed mode handling
SDVO is the only connector type currently returning the VBT
fixed mode directly from .get_modes(), everyone else just
adds it to the fixed_modes list and then returns that from
.get_modes(). Adjust SDVO to follow the common behaviour.
Ville Syrjälä [Wed, 23 Mar 2022 18:29:34 +0000 (20:29 +0200)]
drm/i915: Use intel_panel_edid_fixed_mode() for sdvo
Despite the name intel_panel_edid_fixed_mode() doesn't actually
look in the EDID. All it does is dig out the preferred mode from
the connector's probed_modes list. That is also what the SDVO
LVDS code is doing by hand. Let's just call
intel_panel_edid_fixed_mode().
The slight difference in behaviour is that the SDVO code currently
bails if it can't find the preferred mode, whereas
intel_panel_edid_fixed_mode() will fall back to just returning
the first mode from the probed_modes list. Can't imagine why
such an LVDS panel would even exist, and also why would you have
a panel and be expected to not use it? So I'm going to assume
this is a total non-issue.
Apart from the EDID and VBT based mechanism we also sometimes
use the encoder's current mode as the panel fixed mode. We
currently have the same code for that duplicated in two places.
Let's unify.
Ville Syrjälä [Wed, 23 Mar 2022 18:29:31 +0000 (20:29 +0200)]
drm/i915: Rename intel_panel_vbt_fixed_mode()
Rename intel_panel_vbt_fixed_mode() to
intel_panel_vbt_lfp_fixed_mode() to be more descriptive.
We'll have another VBT fixed mode function soon and we
don't want to confuse the two.
Ville Syrjälä [Wed, 23 Mar 2022 18:29:30 +0000 (20:29 +0200)]
drm/i915: Use intel_panel_preferred_fixed_mode() more
Use intel_panel_preferred_fixed_mode() for all the orientation
quirk setup and compute_is_dual_link_lvds()). All of these
happen after intel_panel_init() so the panel fixed_mode list
is already in place.
Ville Syrjälä [Wed, 23 Mar 2022 18:29:29 +0000 (20:29 +0200)]
drm/i915: Extract intel_edp_add_properties()
Pull the drm_connector_set_panel_orientation_with_quirk()
into intel_edp_add_properties() to match how the DSI encoders
do it. Less clutter in intel_edp_init_connector() overall.
Ville Syrjälä [Wed, 23 Mar 2022 18:29:28 +0000 (20:29 +0200)]
drm/i915: Use DRM_MODE_FMT+DRM_MODE_ARG()
Replace all drm_mode_debug_printmodeline() calls with
DRM_MODE_FMT+DRM_MODE_ARG(). Makes the debug output a bit more
terse in places where we previously had a newline in the precedeing
drm_dbg_kms(), and avoids anything else sneaking in between the two
printk()s in all cases.
Ville Syrjälä [Thu, 24 Feb 2022 16:51:03 +0000 (18:51 +0200)]
drm/i915: Split pipe+output CSC programming to noarm+arm pair
Move most of the pipe+output CSC programming to the
.color_commit_noarm() hook which runs before vblank evasion.
Only PIPE_CSC_MODE (the arming register) needs to remain in
inside the critical section.
A test case that just updates the CTM in a loop produces
the following i915_update_info numbers on ilk (w/o lockdep):
old new
Updates: 10012 Updates: 10008
| |
1us |** 1us |**********
|************* |*************
4us |********* 4us |*
|* |**
16us | 16us |
| |
66us | 66us |
| |
262us | 262us |
| |
1ms | 1ms |
| |
4ms | 4ms |
| |
17ms | 17ms |
| |
Min update: 1345ns Min update: 1268ns
Max update: 16672ns Max update: 15656ns
Average update: 3914ns Average update: 2185ns
Overruns > 100us: 0 Overruns > 100us: 0
And here is tgl (forced to update both pipe CSC and
output CSC, and with lockdep enabled):
old new
Updates: 10012 Updates: 10012
| |
1us | 1us |
| |
4us |* 4us |**
|** |**********
16us |************* 16us |*************
|* |
66us | 66us |
| |
262us | 262us |
| |
1ms | 1ms |
| |
4ms | 4ms |
| |
17ms | 17ms |
| |
Min update: 5204ns Min update: 5176ns
Max update: 176038ns Max update: 186685ns
Average update: 23931ns Average update: 16654ns
Overruns > 250us: 0 Overruns > 250us: 0
Ville Syrjälä [Thu, 24 Feb 2022 16:51:02 +0000 (18:51 +0200)]
drm/i915: Split color_commit() into noarm+arm pair
To reduce the amount of registers written during the vblank evade
critical section let's also split the .color_commit() hook to
noarm+arm pair. The noarm hook runs before the vblank evasion
with the arm hook staying inside the critical section.
Just the framework here, actually moving stuff out into the noarm
hook will follow.
Ville Syrjälä [Thu, 24 Feb 2022 16:51:00 +0000 (18:51 +0200)]
drm/i915: Remove locks around skl+ scaler programming
All the skl+ scaler registers are suitably confined to their own
cachelines so we don't need the uncore.lock to globally serialize
access to these registers. We actually already dropped some of this
in commit 14ad15296d1f ("drm/i915: Make skl+ universal plane
registers unlocked") as the plane scaler enabling/reconfiguration
became lockless. So let's complete that and remove the rest of
the locks from the scaler programming as well.
intel_drrs_enable() and intel_drrs_disable() were renamed to
intel_drrs_activate() and intel_drrs_deactivate() in commit 54903c7a6b40 ("drm/i915: s/enable/active/ for DRRS") and it is
causing warnings when generating the kernel documentation.
But as for a while DRRS has its own file, so here just let the tool
generate the documentation for all exported and documented functions
in intel_drrs.c.
Imre Deak [Tue, 22 Mar 2022 14:38:44 +0000 (16:38 +0200)]
drm/i915: Add a DP1.2 compatible way to read LTTPR capabilities
At least some DELL monitors (P2715Q) with DPCD_REV 1.2 return corrupted
DPCD register values when reading from the 0xF0000- LTTPR range with an
AUX transaction block size bigger than 1. The DP standard requires 0 to
be returned - as for any other reserved/invalid addresses - but these
monitors return the DPCD_REV register value repeated in each byte of the
read buffer. This will in turn corrupt the values returned by the LTTPRs
between the source and the monitor: LTTPRs must adjust the values they
read from the downstream DPRX, for instance right-shift/init the
downstream DP_PHY_REPEATER_CNT value. Since the value returned by the
monitor's DPRX is non-zero the adjusted values will be corrupt.
Reading the LTTPR registers one-by-one instead of reading all of them
with a single AUX transfer works around the issue.
According to the DP standard's 0xF0000 register description:
"LTTPR-related registers at DPCD Addresses F0000h through F02FFh are
valid only for DPCD r1.4 (or higher)." While it's unclear if DPCD r1.4
refers to the DPCD_REV or to the
LT_TUNABLE_PHY_REPEATER_FIELD_DATA_STRUCTURE_REV register (tickets filed
at the VESA site to clarify this haven't been addressed), one
possibility is that it's a restriction due to non-compliant monitors
described above. Disabling the non-transparent LTTPR mode for all such
monitors is not a viable solution: the transparent LTTPR mode has its
own issue causing link training failures and this would affect a lot of
monitors in use with DPCD_REV < 1.4. Instead this patch works around
the problem by reading the LTTPR common and PHY cap registers one-by-one
for any monitor with a DPCD_REV < 1.4.
The standard requires the DPCD capabilities to be read after the LTTPR
common capabilities are read, so re-read the DPCD capabilities after
the LTTPR common and PHY caps were read out.
v2:
- Use for instead of a while loop. (Ville)
- Add to code comment the monitor model with the problem.
Ville Syrjälä [Tue, 15 Mar 2022 13:27:52 +0000 (15:27 +0200)]
drm/i915: s/enable/active/ for DRRS
Rename the DRRS functiosn to say "(de)activate" rather than
"enable/disable". This let's us differentiate between the
logically enabled vs. actually currently active cases.
Ville Syrjälä [Thu, 3 Mar 2022 19:12:06 +0000 (21:12 +0200)]
drm/i915: Fix DBUF bandwidth vs. cdclk handling
Make the dbuf bandwidth min cdclk calculations match the spec
more closely. Supposedly the arbiter can only guarantee an equal
share of the total bandwidth of the slice to each active plane
on that slice. So we take the max bandwidth of any of the planes
on each slice and multiply that by the number of active planes
on the slice to get a worst case estimate on how much bandwidth
we require.
Ville Syrjälä [Thu, 3 Mar 2022 19:12:05 +0000 (21:12 +0200)]
drm/i915: Properly write lock bw_state when it changes
The current code also forgets to call intel_atomic_lock_global_state()
when other stuff besides the final min_cdlck changes in the state.
That means we may throw away data which actually has changed, and
thus we can't be at all sure what the code ends up doing during
subsequent commits. Do the write lock properly.
Ville Syrjälä [Thu, 3 Mar 2022 19:12:03 +0000 (21:12 +0200)]
drm/i915: Nuke intel_bw_calc_min_cdclk()
intel_bw_calc_min_cdclk() is entirely pointless. All it manages to do is
somehow conflate the per-pipe min cdclk with dbuf min cdclk. There is no
(at least documented) dbuf min cdclk limit on pre-skl so let's just get
rid of all this confusion.
Ville Syrjälä [Thu, 3 Mar 2022 19:12:02 +0000 (21:12 +0200)]
drm/i915: Remove total[] and uv_total[] from ddb allocation
There's really no need to maintain these total[] arrays to
track the size of each plane's ddb allocation. We just stick
the results straight into the crtc_state ddb tracking structures.
The main annoyance with all this is the mismatch between
wm_uv vs. ddb_y on pre-icl. If only the hw was consistent in
what it considers the primary source of information we could
avoid some of the uglyness. But since that is not the case
we need a bit of special casing for planar formats.
v2: Keep the ddb entry zeroed when the plane is disabled
Ville Syrjälä [Thu, 3 Mar 2022 19:12:01 +0000 (21:12 +0200)]
drm/i915: Pre-calculate plane relative data rate
Handle the plane relative data rate in exactly the same
way as we already handle the real data rate. Ie. pre-calculate
it during intel_plane_atomic_check_with_state(), and assign/clear
it for the Y plane as needed. This should guarantee that the
tracking is 100% consistent, and makes me have to think less
when the same apporach is used by both types of data rate.
We might even want to consider replacing the relative
data rate with the real data rate entirely, but it's not
clear if that will produce less optimal plane ddb
allocations. So for now lets keep using the current approach.
Ville Syrjälä [Thu, 3 Mar 2022 19:12:00 +0000 (21:12 +0200)]
drm/i915: Split plane data_rate into data_rate+data_rate_y
Split the currently combined plane data_rate into the proper
Y vs. CbCr components. This matches how we now track the
plane dbuf allocations, and thus will make the dbuf bandwidth
calculations actually produce the correct numbers for each
dbuf slice.
Ville Syrjälä [Thu, 3 Mar 2022 19:11:59 +0000 (21:11 +0200)]
drm/i915: Tweak plane ddb allocation tracking
Let's store the plane allocation in a manner which more closely
matches how the hw operates. That is, we store the packed/CbCr
ddb in one struct, and the Y ddb in another. Currently we're
storing packed/Y in one struct, CbCr in the other.
This also works pretty well for icl+ where the UV plane is
the main plane and the Y plane is subservient to it. Although
in this case we do not even use ddb_y as we do the ddb allocation
in terms of hw planes.
drm/i915/display/adlp: More voltage swing table updates
A few more updates in the alderlake-P voltage swing tables.
eDP HBR3 table was the same as icelake one but now it has changes for
voltage 0 and pre-emphasis 2 line.
And DP tables also had one line change in each.
Ville Syrjälä [Wed, 9 Mar 2022 16:49:46 +0000 (18:49 +0200)]
drm/i915: Fix PSF GV point mask when SAGV is not possible
Don't just mask off all the PSF GV points when SAGV gets disabled.
This should in fact cause the Pcode to reject the request since
at least one PSF point must remain enabled at all times.
Give the pre-icl SAGV control functions a skl_ prefix instead
of the intel_ prefix to make it a bit more clear that they
are not some kind of universal things that can be called on
any platform. Also make the functions void since we never
use the return value anyway.
Ville Syrjälä [Wed, 9 Mar 2022 16:49:44 +0000 (18:49 +0200)]
drm/i915: Reject excessive SAGV block time
If the mailbox returns an exceesively large SAGV block time let's just
reject it. This avoids having to worry about overflows when we add the
SAGV block time to the wm0 latency.
We shall put the limit arbitrarily at U16_MAX. >65msec latency
doesn't really make sense to me in any case.
Ville Syrjälä [Wed, 9 Mar 2022 16:49:43 +0000 (18:49 +0200)]
drm/i915: Probe whether SAGV works on pre-icl
Instead of leaving the SAGV enable/disable to the first commit
let's try to disable it first thing to see if we can do it or
not (disabling SAGV is a safe thing to at any time). This avoids
running the code in this funny intermediate state where we don't
know if SAGV is available or not.
Ville Syrjälä [Wed, 9 Mar 2022 16:49:41 +0000 (18:49 +0200)]
drm/i915: Treat SAGV block time 0 as SAGV disabled
For modern platforms the spec explicitly states that a
SAGV block time of zero means that SAGV is not supported.
Let's extend that to all platforms. Supposedly there should
be no systems where this isn't true, and it'll allow us to:
- use the same code regardless of older vs. newer platform
- wm latencies already treat 0 as disabled, so this fits well
with other related code
- make it a bit more clear when SAGV is used vs. not
- avoid overflows from adding U32_MAX with a u16 wm0 latency value
which could cause us to miscalculate the SAGV watermarks on tgl+
Jani Nikula [Fri, 11 Mar 2022 10:06:39 +0000 (12:06 +0200)]
drm/i915: include uapi/drm/i915_drm.h directly where needed
Remove the uapi/drm/i915_drm.h include from drm/i915_drm.h, and stop
being a proxy for uapi/drm/i915_drm.h. Include uapi/drm/i915_drm.h and
drm/i915_drm.h only where needed.
Jani Nikula [Wed, 16 Mar 2022 09:50:18 +0000 (11:50 +0200)]
drm/i915: move i915_gem_object_needs_bit17_swizzle() to i915_gem_tiling.[ch]
Move i915_gem_object_needs_bit17_swizzle() to i915_gem_tiling.[ch] as a
i915_gem_object function related to tiling. Also un-inline while at it;
does not seem like this is a function needed in hot paths.
v2: i915_gem_tiling.[ch] instead of intel_ggtt_fencing.[ch] (Chris)
Ville Syrjälä [Fri, 11 Mar 2022 21:28:45 +0000 (23:28 +0200)]
drm/i915: Reject unsupported TMDS rates on ICL+
ICL+ PLLs can't genenerate certain frequencies. Running the PLL
algorithms through for all frequencies 25-594MHz we see a gap just
above 500 MHz. Specifically 500-522.8MHZ for TC PLLs, and 500-533.2
MHz for combo PHY PLLs. Reject those frequencies hdmi_port_clock_valid()
so that we properly filter out unsupported modes and/or color depths
for HDMI.
Ville Syrjälä [Tue, 15 Mar 2022 13:27:51 +0000 (15:27 +0200)]
drm/i915: Deal with bigjoiner vs. DRRS
DRRS operates on transcoder level, so we should only poke at it from
the master crtc rather than letting every joined pipe give it
potentially conflicting input.
Ville Syrjälä [Tue, 15 Mar 2022 21:39:44 +0000 (23:39 +0200)]
drm/i915: Do DRRS disable/enable during pre/post_plane_update()
Let's just do a full DRRS disable/enable across all pipe updates.
This guarantees that the DRRS work doesn't interfere with anything
while the atomic commit is busy reprogramming the pipe.
Needed so that we can start reprogramming M/N seamlessly during
fastsets whenever possible. Also avoids the pre-bdw DRRS PIPECONF
rmw racing with the potential PIPECONF write from the atomic
commit (eg. due to GAMMA_MODE changes).
Ville Syrjälä [Tue, 15 Mar 2022 13:27:46 +0000 (15:27 +0200)]
drm/i915: Fix DRRS frontbuffer_bits handling
Now that DRRS can operate on multiple pipes we need to make sure
one pipe doesn't throw away the other pipe's frontbuffer_bits before
said pipe can handle them.
Ville Syrjälä [Tue, 15 Mar 2022 13:27:44 +0000 (15:27 +0200)]
drm/i915: Put the downclock_mode check back into can_enable_drrs()
With static DRRS the user might ask for the lowest possible refresh
rate of the panel, in which case we're not going to find a suitable
downclock mode for it and we should not try to enable seamless DRRS.
This will in fact oops.
We used to check for the presence of the downclock mode here, but
that got removed in commit f0a57798fb5c ("drm/i915: Introduce
intel_panel_drrs_type()") as redundant (which it was at the time).
But we do need the check again now that static DRRS is a thing.
I must have not re-tested static DRRS fully after introducing
intel_panel_drrs_type() :/