mm, treewide: rename kzfree() to kfree_sensitive()

mm, treewide: rename kzfree() to kfree_sensitive()

As said by Linus:

  A symmetric naming is only helpful if it implies symmetries in use.
  Otherwise it's actively misleading.

  In "kzalloc()", the z is meaningful and an important part of what the
  caller wants.

  In "kzfree()", the z is actively detrimental, because maybe in the
  future we really _might_ want to use that "memfill(0xdeadbeef)" or
  something. The "zero" part of the interface isn't even _relevant_.

The main reason that kzfree() exists is to clear sensitive information
that should not be leaked to other future users of the same memory
objects.

Rename kzfree() to kfree_sensitive() to follow the example of the recently
added kvfree_sensitive() and make the intention of the API more explicit.
In addition, memzero_explicit() is used to clear the memory to make sure
that it won't get optimized away by the compiler.

The renaming is done by using the command sequence:

  git grep -w --name-only kzfree |\
  xargs sed -i 's/kzfree/kfree_sensitive/'

followed by some editing of the kfree_sensitive() kerneldoc and adding
a kzfree backward compatibility macro in slab.h.

[[email protected]: fs/crypto/inline_crypt.c needs linux/slab.h]
[[email protected]: fix fs/crypto/inline_crypt.c some more]

Suggested-by: Joe Perches <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Acked-by: David Howells <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]>
Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <[email protected]>
Cc: James Morris <[email protected]>
Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>
Cc: Joe Perches <[email protected]>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>
Cc: "Jason A . Donenfeld" <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>