* Various filesystems appear to want __find_get_block to be non-blocking.
* But it's the page lock which protects the buffers. To get around this,
* we get exclusion from try_to_free_buffers with the blockdev mapping's
- * private_lock.
+ * i_private_lock.
*
- * Hack idea: for the blockdev mapping, private_lock contention
+ * Hack idea: for the blockdev mapping, i_private_lock contention
* may be quite high. This code could TryLock the page, and if that
- * succeeds, there is no need to take private_lock.
+ * succeeds, there is no need to take i_private_lock.
*/
static struct buffer_head *
__find_get_block_slow(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block)
if (IS_ERR(folio))
goto out;
- spin_lock(&bd_mapping->private_lock);
+ spin_lock(&bd_mapping->i_private_lock);
head = folio_buffers(folio);
if (!head)
goto out_unlock;
1 << bd_inode->i_blkbits);
}
out_unlock:
- spin_unlock(&bd_mapping->private_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&bd_mapping->i_private_lock);
folio_put(folio);
out:
return ret;
*
* The functions mark_buffer_inode_dirty(), fsync_inode_buffers(),
* inode_has_buffers() and invalidate_inode_buffers() are provided for the
- * management of a list of dependent buffers at ->i_mapping->private_list.
+ * management of a list of dependent buffers at ->i_mapping->i_private_list.
*
* Locking is a little subtle: try_to_free_buffers() will remove buffers
* from their controlling inode's queue when they are being freed. But
* try_to_free_buffers() will be operating against the *blockdev* mapping
* at the time, not against the S_ISREG file which depends on those buffers.
- * So the locking for private_list is via the private_lock in the address_space
+ * So the locking for i_private_list is via the i_private_lock in the address_space
* which backs the buffers. Which is different from the address_space
* against which the buffers are listed. So for a particular address_space,
- * mapping->private_lock does *not* protect mapping->private_list! In fact,
- * mapping->private_list will always be protected by the backing blockdev's
- * ->private_lock.
+ * mapping->i_private_lock does *not* protect mapping->i_private_list! In fact,
+ * mapping->i_private_list will always be protected by the backing blockdev's
+ * ->i_private_lock.
*
* Which introduces a requirement: all buffers on an address_space's
- * ->private_list must be from the same address_space: the blockdev's.
+ * ->i_private_list must be from the same address_space: the blockdev's.
*
- * address_spaces which do not place buffers at ->private_list via these
- * utility functions are free to use private_lock and private_list for
- * whatever they want. The only requirement is that list_empty(private_list)
+ * address_spaces which do not place buffers at ->i_private_list via these
+ * utility functions are free to use i_private_lock and i_private_list for
+ * whatever they want. The only requirement is that list_empty(i_private_list)
* be true at clear_inode() time.
*
* FIXME: clear_inode should not call invalidate_inode_buffers(). The
*/
/*
- * The buffer's backing address_space's private_lock must be held
+ * The buffer's backing address_space's i_private_lock must be held
*/
static void __remove_assoc_queue(struct buffer_head *bh)
{
int inode_has_buffers(struct inode *inode)
{
- return !list_empty(&inode->i_data.private_list);
+ return !list_empty(&inode->i_data.i_private_list);
}
/*
* sync_mapping_buffers - write out & wait upon a mapping's "associated" buffers
* @mapping: the mapping which wants those buffers written
*
- * Starts I/O against the buffers at mapping->private_list, and waits upon
+ * Starts I/O against the buffers at mapping->i_private_list, and waits upon
* that I/O.
*
* Basically, this is a convenience function for fsync().
*/
int sync_mapping_buffers(struct address_space *mapping)
{
- struct address_space *buffer_mapping = mapping->private_data;
+ struct address_space *buffer_mapping = mapping->i_private_data;
- if (buffer_mapping == NULL || list_empty(&mapping->private_list))
+ if (buffer_mapping == NULL || list_empty(&mapping->i_private_list))
return 0;
- return fsync_buffers_list(&buffer_mapping->private_lock,
- &mapping->private_list);
+ return fsync_buffers_list(&buffer_mapping->i_private_lock,
+ &mapping->i_private_list);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(sync_mapping_buffers);
struct address_space *buffer_mapping = bh->b_folio->mapping;
mark_buffer_dirty(bh);
- if (!mapping->private_data) {
- mapping->private_data = buffer_mapping;
+ if (!mapping->i_private_data) {
+ mapping->i_private_data = buffer_mapping;
} else {
- BUG_ON(mapping->private_data != buffer_mapping);
+ BUG_ON(mapping->i_private_data != buffer_mapping);
}
if (!bh->b_assoc_map) {
- spin_lock(&buffer_mapping->private_lock);
+ spin_lock(&buffer_mapping->i_private_lock);
list_move_tail(&bh->b_assoc_buffers,
- &mapping->private_list);
+ &mapping->i_private_list);
bh->b_assoc_map = mapping;
- spin_unlock(&buffer_mapping->private_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&buffer_mapping->i_private_lock);
}
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(mark_buffer_dirty_inode);
* bit, see a bunch of clean buffers and we'd end up with dirty buffers/clean
* page on the dirty page list.
*
- * We use private_lock to lock against try_to_free_buffers while using the
+ * We use i_private_lock to lock against try_to_free_buffers while using the
* page's buffer list. Also use this to protect against clean buffers being
* added to the page after it was set dirty.
*
struct buffer_head *head;
bool newly_dirty;
- spin_lock(&mapping->private_lock);
+ spin_lock(&mapping->i_private_lock);
head = folio_buffers(folio);
if (head) {
struct buffer_head *bh = head;
*/
folio_memcg_lock(folio);
newly_dirty = !folio_test_set_dirty(folio);
- spin_unlock(&mapping->private_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&mapping->i_private_lock);
if (newly_dirty)
__folio_mark_dirty(folio, mapping, 1);
smp_mb();
if (buffer_dirty(bh)) {
list_add(&bh->b_assoc_buffers,
- &mapping->private_list);
+ &mapping->i_private_list);
bh->b_assoc_map = mapping;
}
spin_unlock(lock);
* probably unmounting the fs, but that doesn't mean we have already
* done a sync(). Just drop the buffers from the inode list.
*
- * NOTE: we take the inode's blockdev's mapping's private_lock. Which
+ * NOTE: we take the inode's blockdev's mapping's i_private_lock. Which
* assumes that all the buffers are against the blockdev. Not true
* for reiserfs.
*/
{
if (inode_has_buffers(inode)) {
struct address_space *mapping = &inode->i_data;
- struct list_head *list = &mapping->private_list;
- struct address_space *buffer_mapping = mapping->private_data;
+ struct list_head *list = &mapping->i_private_list;
+ struct address_space *buffer_mapping = mapping->i_private_data;
- spin_lock(&buffer_mapping->private_lock);
+ spin_lock(&buffer_mapping->i_private_lock);
while (!list_empty(list))
__remove_assoc_queue(BH_ENTRY(list->next));
- spin_unlock(&buffer_mapping->private_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&buffer_mapping->i_private_lock);
}
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(invalidate_inode_buffers);
if (inode_has_buffers(inode)) {
struct address_space *mapping = &inode->i_data;
- struct list_head *list = &mapping->private_list;
- struct address_space *buffer_mapping = mapping->private_data;
+ struct list_head *list = &mapping->i_private_list;
+ struct address_space *buffer_mapping = mapping->i_private_data;
- spin_lock(&buffer_mapping->private_lock);
+ spin_lock(&buffer_mapping->i_private_lock);
while (!list_empty(list)) {
struct buffer_head *bh = BH_ENTRY(list->next);
if (buffer_dirty(bh)) {
}
__remove_assoc_queue(bh);
}
- spin_unlock(&buffer_mapping->private_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&buffer_mapping->i_private_lock);
}
return ret;
}
* lock to be atomic wrt __find_get_block(), which does not
* run under the folio lock.
*/
- spin_lock(&inode->i_mapping->private_lock);
+ spin_lock(&inode->i_mapping->i_private_lock);
link_dev_buffers(folio, bh);
end_block = folio_init_buffers(folio, bdev,
(sector_t)index << sizebits, size);
- spin_unlock(&inode->i_mapping->private_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&inode->i_mapping->i_private_lock);
done:
ret = (block < end_block) ? 1 : -ENXIO;
failed:
* and then attach the address_space's inode to its superblock's dirty
* inode list.
*
- * mark_buffer_dirty() is atomic. It takes bh->b_folio->mapping->private_lock,
+ * mark_buffer_dirty() is atomic. It takes bh->b_folio->mapping->i_private_lock,
* i_pages lock and mapping->host->i_lock.
*/
void mark_buffer_dirty(struct buffer_head *bh)
if (bh->b_assoc_map) {
struct address_space *buffer_mapping = bh->b_folio->mapping;
- spin_lock(&buffer_mapping->private_lock);
+ spin_lock(&buffer_mapping->i_private_lock);
list_del_init(&bh->b_assoc_buffers);
bh->b_assoc_map = NULL;
- spin_unlock(&buffer_mapping->private_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&buffer_mapping->i_private_lock);
}
__brelse(bh);
}
/*
* We attach and possibly dirty the buffers atomically wrt
- * block_dirty_folio() via private_lock. try_to_free_buffers
+ * block_dirty_folio() via i_private_lock. try_to_free_buffers
* is already excluded via the folio lock.
*/
struct buffer_head *create_empty_buffers(struct folio *folio,
} while (bh);
tail->b_this_page = head;
- spin_lock(&folio->mapping->private_lock);
+ spin_lock(&folio->mapping->i_private_lock);
if (folio_test_uptodate(folio) || folio_test_dirty(folio)) {
bh = head;
do {
} while (bh != head);
}
folio_attach_private(folio, head);
- spin_unlock(&folio->mapping->private_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&folio->mapping->i_private_lock);
return head;
}
if (!folio_buffers(folio))
continue;
/*
- * We use folio lock instead of bd_mapping->private_lock
+ * We use folio lock instead of bd_mapping->i_private_lock
* to pin buffers here since we can afford to sleep and
* it scales better than a global spinlock lock.
*/
* are unused, and releases them if so.
*
* Exclusion against try_to_free_buffers may be obtained by either
- * locking the folio or by holding its mapping's private_lock.
+ * locking the folio or by holding its mapping's i_private_lock.
*
* If the folio is dirty but all the buffers are clean then we need to
* be sure to mark the folio clean as well. This is because the folio
* The same applies to regular filesystem folios: if all the buffers are
* clean then we set the folio clean and proceed. To do that, we require
* total exclusion from block_dirty_folio(). That is obtained with
- * private_lock.
+ * i_private_lock.
*
* try_to_free_buffers() is non-blocking.
*/
goto out;
}
- spin_lock(&mapping->private_lock);
+ spin_lock(&mapping->i_private_lock);
ret = drop_buffers(folio, &buffers_to_free);
/*
* the folio's buffers clean. We discover that here and clean
* the folio also.
*
- * private_lock must be held over this entire operation in order
+ * i_private_lock must be held over this entire operation in order
* to synchronise against block_dirty_folio and prevent the
* dirty bit from being lost.
*/
if (ret)
folio_cancel_dirty(folio);
- spin_unlock(&mapping->private_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&mapping->i_private_lock);
out:
if (buffers_to_free) {
struct buffer_head *bh = buffers_to_free;