]>
Commit | Line | Data |
---|---|---|
1da177e4 LT |
1 | 27-Dec-2002 |
2 | ||
3 | The EHCI driver is used to talk to high speed USB 2.0 devices using | |
4 | USB 2.0-capable host controller hardware. The USB 2.0 standard is | |
5 | compatible with the USB 1.1 standard. It defines three transfer speeds: | |
6 | ||
7 | - "High Speed" 480 Mbit/sec (60 MByte/sec) | |
8 | - "Full Speed" 12 Mbit/sec (1.5 MByte/sec) | |
9 | - "Low Speed" 1.5 Mbit/sec | |
10 | ||
11 | USB 1.1 only addressed full speed and low speed. High speed devices | |
254217d1 | 12 | can be used on USB 1.1 systems, but they slow down to USB 1.1 speeds. |
1da177e4 LT |
13 | |
14 | USB 1.1 devices may also be used on USB 2.0 systems. When plugged | |
15 | into an EHCI controller, they are given to a USB 1.1 "companion" | |
16 | controller, which is a OHCI or UHCI controller as normally used with | |
17 | such devices. When USB 1.1 devices plug into USB 2.0 hubs, they | |
18 | interact with the EHCI controller through a "Transaction Translator" | |
19 | (TT) in the hub, which turns low or full speed transactions into | |
20 | high speed "split transactions" that don't waste transfer bandwidth. | |
21 | ||
22 | At this writing, this driver has been seen to work with implementations | |
23 | of EHCI from (in alphabetical order): Intel, NEC, Philips, and VIA. | |
24 | Other EHCI implementations are becoming available from other vendors; | |
25 | you should expect this driver to work with them too. | |
26 | ||
27 | While usb-storage devices have been available since mid-2001 (working | |
28 | quite speedily on the 2.4 version of this driver), hubs have only | |
29 | been available since late 2001, and other kinds of high speed devices | |
30 | appear to be on hold until more systems come with USB 2.0 built-in. | |
31 | Such new systems have been available since early 2002, and became much | |
32 | more typical in the second half of 2002. | |
33 | ||
34 | Note that USB 2.0 support involves more than just EHCI. It requires | |
35 | other changes to the Linux-USB core APIs, including the hub driver, | |
36 | but those changes haven't needed to really change the basic "usbcore" | |
37 | APIs exposed to USB device drivers. | |
38 | ||
39 | - David Brownell | |
40 | <[email protected]> | |
41 | ||
42 | ||
43 | FUNCTIONALITY | |
44 | ||
45 | This driver is regularly tested on x86 hardware, and has also been | |
46 | used on PPC hardware so big/little endianness issues should be gone. | |
47 | It's believed to do all the right PCI magic so that I/O works even on | |
48 | systems with interesting DMA mapping issues. | |
49 | ||
50 | Transfer Types | |
51 | ||
52 | At this writing the driver should comfortably handle all control, bulk, | |
53 | and interrupt transfers, including requests to USB 1.1 devices through | |
54 | transaction translators (TTs) in USB 2.0 hubs. But you may find bugs. | |
55 | ||
56 | High Speed Isochronous (ISO) transfer support is also functional, but | |
57 | at this writing no Linux drivers have been using that support. | |
58 | ||
59 | Full Speed Isochronous transfer support, through transaction translators, | |
60 | is not yet available. Note that split transaction support for ISO | |
61 | transfers can't share much code with the code for high speed ISO transfers, | |
62 | since EHCI represents these with a different data structure. So for now, | |
63 | most USB audio and video devices can't be connected to high speed buses. | |
64 | ||
65 | Driver Behavior | |
66 | ||
67 | Transfers of all types can be queued. This means that control transfers | |
68 | from a driver on one interface (or through usbfs) won't interfere with | |
69 | ones from another driver, and that interrupt transfers can use periods | |
70 | of one frame without risking data loss due to interrupt processing costs. | |
71 | ||
72 | The EHCI root hub code hands off USB 1.1 devices to its companion | |
73 | controller. This driver doesn't need to know anything about those | |
74 | drivers; a OHCI or UHCI driver that works already doesn't need to change | |
75 | just because the EHCI driver is also present. | |
76 | ||
77 | There are some issues with power management; suspend/resume doesn't | |
78 | behave quite right at the moment. | |
79 | ||
80 | Also, some shortcuts have been taken with the scheduling periodic | |
81 | transactions (interrupt and isochronous transfers). These place some | |
82 | limits on the number of periodic transactions that can be scheduled, | |
83 | and prevent use of polling intervals of less than one frame. | |
84 | ||
85 | ||
86 | USE BY | |
87 | ||
88 | Assuming you have an EHCI controller (on a PCI card or motherboard) | |
89 | and have compiled this driver as a module, load this like: | |
90 | ||
91 | # modprobe ehci-hcd | |
92 | ||
93 | and remove it by: | |
94 | ||
95 | # rmmod ehci-hcd | |
96 | ||
97 | You should also have a driver for a "companion controller", such as | |
98 | "ohci-hcd" or "uhci-hcd". In case of any trouble with the EHCI driver, | |
99 | remove its module and then the driver for that companion controller will | |
100 | take over (at lower speed) all the devices that were previously handled | |
101 | by the EHCI driver. | |
102 | ||
103 | Module parameters (pass to "modprobe") include: | |
104 | ||
105 | log2_irq_thresh (default 0): | |
106 | Log2 of default interrupt delay, in microframes. The default | |
107 | value is 0, indicating 1 microframe (125 usec). Maximum value | |
108 | is 6, indicating 2^6 = 64 microframes. This controls how often | |
109 | the EHCI controller can issue interrupts. | |
110 | ||
111 | If you're using this driver on a 2.5 kernel, and you've enabled USB | |
112 | debugging support, you'll see three files in the "sysfs" directory for | |
113 | any EHCI controller: | |
114 | ||
115 | "async" dumps the asynchronous schedule, used for control | |
116 | and bulk transfers. Shows each active qh and the qtds | |
117 | pending, usually one qtd per urb. (Look at it with | |
118 | usb-storage doing disk I/O; watch the request queues!) | |
119 | "periodic" dumps the periodic schedule, used for interrupt | |
120 | and isochronous transfers. Doesn't show qtds. | |
121 | "registers" show controller register state, and | |
122 | ||
123 | The contents of those files can help identify driver problems. | |
124 | ||
125 | ||
126 | Device drivers shouldn't care whether they're running over EHCI or not, | |
127 | but they may want to check for "usb_device->speed == USB_SPEED_HIGH". | |
128 | High speed devices can do things that full speed (or low speed) ones | |
129 | can't, such as "high bandwidth" periodic (interrupt or ISO) transfers. | |
130 | Also, some values in device descriptors (such as polling intervals for | |
131 | periodic transfers) use different encodings when operating at high speed. | |
132 | ||
133 | However, do make a point of testing device drivers through USB 2.0 hubs. | |
134 | Those hubs report some failures, such as disconnections, differently when | |
135 | transaction translators are in use; some drivers have been seen to behave | |
136 | badly when they see different faults than OHCI or UHCI report. | |
137 | ||
138 | ||
139 | PERFORMANCE | |
140 | ||
141 | USB 2.0 throughput is gated by two main factors: how fast the host | |
142 | controller can process requests, and how fast devices can respond to | |
143 | them. The 480 Mbit/sec "raw transfer rate" is obeyed by all devices, | |
144 | but aggregate throughput is also affected by issues like delays between | |
145 | individual high speed packets, driver intelligence, and of course the | |
146 | overall system load. Latency is also a performance concern. | |
147 | ||
148 | Bulk transfers are most often used where throughput is an issue. It's | |
149 | good to keep in mind that bulk transfers are always in 512 byte packets, | |
150 | and at most 13 of those fit into one USB 2.0 microframe. Eight USB 2.0 | |
151 | microframes fit in a USB 1.1 frame; a microframe is 1 msec/8 = 125 usec. | |
152 | ||
153 | So more than 50 MByte/sec is available for bulk transfers, when both | |
154 | hardware and device driver software allow it. Periodic transfer modes | |
155 | (isochronous and interrupt) allow the larger packet sizes which let you | |
156 | approach the quoted 480 MBit/sec transfer rate. | |
157 | ||
158 | Hardware Performance | |
159 | ||
160 | At this writing, individual USB 2.0 devices tend to max out at around | |
161 | 20 MByte/sec transfer rates. This is of course subject to change; | |
162 | and some devices now go faster, while others go slower. | |
163 | ||
164 | The first NEC implementation of EHCI seems to have a hardware bottleneck | |
165 | at around 28 MByte/sec aggregate transfer rate. While this is clearly | |
166 | enough for a single device at 20 MByte/sec, putting three such devices | |
167 | onto one bus does not get you 60 MByte/sec. The issue appears to be | |
168 | that the controller hardware won't do concurrent USB and PCI access, | |
169 | so that it's only trying six (or maybe seven) USB transactions each | |
170 | microframe rather than thirteen. (Seems like a reasonable trade off | |
171 | for a product that beat all the others to market by over a year!) | |
172 | ||
173 | It's expected that newer implementations will better this, throwing | |
174 | more silicon real estate at the problem so that new motherboard chip | |
175 | sets will get closer to that 60 MByte/sec target. That includes an | |
176 | updated implementation from NEC, as well as other vendors' silicon. | |
177 | ||
178 | There's a minimum latency of one microframe (125 usec) for the host | |
179 | to receive interrupts from the EHCI controller indicating completion | |
180 | of requests. That latency is tunable; there's a module option. By | |
181 | default ehci-hcd driver uses the minimum latency, which means that if | |
182 | you issue a control or bulk request you can often expect to learn that | |
183 | it completed in less than 250 usec (depending on transfer size). | |
184 | ||
185 | Software Performance | |
186 | ||
187 | To get even 20 MByte/sec transfer rates, Linux-USB device drivers will | |
188 | need to keep the EHCI queue full. That means issuing large requests, | |
189 | or using bulk queuing if a series of small requests needs to be issued. | |
190 | When drivers don't do that, their performance results will show it. | |
191 | ||
192 | In typical situations, a usb_bulk_msg() loop writing out 4 KB chunks is | |
193 | going to waste more than half the USB 2.0 bandwidth. Delays between the | |
194 | I/O completion and the driver issuing the next request will take longer | |
195 | than the I/O. If that same loop used 16 KB chunks, it'd be better; a | |
196 | sequence of 128 KB chunks would waste a lot less. | |
197 | ||
198 | But rather than depending on such large I/O buffers to make synchronous | |
199 | I/O be efficient, it's better to just queue up several (bulk) requests | |
200 | to the HC, and wait for them all to complete (or be canceled on error). | |
201 | Such URB queuing should work with all the USB 1.1 HC drivers too. | |
202 | ||
203 | In the Linux 2.5 kernels, new usb_sg_*() api calls have been defined; they | |
204 | queue all the buffers from a scatterlist. They also use scatterlist DMA | |
205 | mapping (which might apply an IOMMU) and IRQ reduction, all of which will | |
206 | help make high speed transfers run as fast as they can. | |
207 | ||
208 | ||
209 | TBD: Interrupt and ISO transfer performance issues. Those periodic | |
210 | transfers are fully scheduled, so the main issue is likely to be how | |
211 | to trigger "high bandwidth" modes. | |
212 | ||
cc62a7eb KS |
213 | TBD: More than standard 80% periodic bandwidth allocation is possible |
214 | through sysfs uframe_periodic_max parameter. Describe that. |