]>
Commit | Line | Data |
---|---|---|
23f78d4a IM |
1 | /* |
2 | * RT-Mutexes: simple blocking mutual exclusion locks with PI support | |
3 | * | |
4 | * started by Ingo Molnar and Thomas Gleixner. | |
5 | * | |
6 | * Copyright (C) 2004-2006 Red Hat, Inc., Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> | |
7 | * Copyright (C) 2005-2006 Timesys Corp., Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> | |
8 | * Copyright (C) 2005 Kihon Technologies Inc., Steven Rostedt | |
9 | * Copyright (C) 2006 Esben Nielsen | |
d07fe82c SR |
10 | * |
11 | * See Documentation/rt-mutex-design.txt for details. | |
23f78d4a IM |
12 | */ |
13 | #include <linux/spinlock.h> | |
14 | #include <linux/module.h> | |
15 | #include <linux/sched.h> | |
16 | #include <linux/timer.h> | |
17 | ||
18 | #include "rtmutex_common.h" | |
19 | ||
23f78d4a IM |
20 | /* |
21 | * lock->owner state tracking: | |
22 | * | |
23 | * lock->owner holds the task_struct pointer of the owner. Bit 0 and 1 | |
24 | * are used to keep track of the "owner is pending" and "lock has | |
25 | * waiters" state. | |
26 | * | |
27 | * owner bit1 bit0 | |
28 | * NULL 0 0 lock is free (fast acquire possible) | |
29 | * NULL 0 1 invalid state | |
30 | * NULL 1 0 Transitional State* | |
31 | * NULL 1 1 invalid state | |
32 | * taskpointer 0 0 lock is held (fast release possible) | |
33 | * taskpointer 0 1 task is pending owner | |
34 | * taskpointer 1 0 lock is held and has waiters | |
35 | * taskpointer 1 1 task is pending owner and lock has more waiters | |
36 | * | |
37 | * Pending ownership is assigned to the top (highest priority) | |
38 | * waiter of the lock, when the lock is released. The thread is woken | |
39 | * up and can now take the lock. Until the lock is taken (bit 0 | |
40 | * cleared) a competing higher priority thread can steal the lock | |
41 | * which puts the woken up thread back on the waiters list. | |
42 | * | |
43 | * The fast atomic compare exchange based acquire and release is only | |
44 | * possible when bit 0 and 1 of lock->owner are 0. | |
45 | * | |
46 | * (*) There's a small time where the owner can be NULL and the | |
47 | * "lock has waiters" bit is set. This can happen when grabbing the lock. | |
48 | * To prevent a cmpxchg of the owner releasing the lock, we need to set this | |
49 | * bit before looking at the lock, hence the reason this is a transitional | |
50 | * state. | |
51 | */ | |
52 | ||
bd197234 | 53 | static void |
23f78d4a IM |
54 | rt_mutex_set_owner(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct task_struct *owner, |
55 | unsigned long mask) | |
56 | { | |
57 | unsigned long val = (unsigned long)owner | mask; | |
58 | ||
59 | if (rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock)) | |
60 | val |= RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS; | |
61 | ||
62 | lock->owner = (struct task_struct *)val; | |
63 | } | |
64 | ||
65 | static inline void clear_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex *lock) | |
66 | { | |
67 | lock->owner = (struct task_struct *) | |
68 | ((unsigned long)lock->owner & ~RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS); | |
69 | } | |
70 | ||
71 | static void fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex *lock) | |
72 | { | |
73 | if (!rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock)) | |
74 | clear_rt_mutex_waiters(lock); | |
75 | } | |
76 | ||
bd197234 TG |
77 | /* |
78 | * We can speed up the acquire/release, if the architecture | |
79 | * supports cmpxchg and if there's no debugging state to be set up | |
80 | */ | |
81 | #if defined(__HAVE_ARCH_CMPXCHG) && !defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES) | |
82 | # define rt_mutex_cmpxchg(l,c,n) (cmpxchg(&l->owner, c, n) == c) | |
83 | static inline void mark_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex *lock) | |
84 | { | |
85 | unsigned long owner, *p = (unsigned long *) &lock->owner; | |
86 | ||
87 | do { | |
88 | owner = *p; | |
89 | } while (cmpxchg(p, owner, owner | RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS) != owner); | |
90 | } | |
91 | #else | |
92 | # define rt_mutex_cmpxchg(l,c,n) (0) | |
93 | static inline void mark_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex *lock) | |
94 | { | |
95 | lock->owner = (struct task_struct *) | |
96 | ((unsigned long)lock->owner | RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS); | |
97 | } | |
98 | #endif | |
99 | ||
23f78d4a IM |
100 | /* |
101 | * Calculate task priority from the waiter list priority | |
102 | * | |
103 | * Return task->normal_prio when the waiter list is empty or when | |
104 | * the waiter is not allowed to do priority boosting | |
105 | */ | |
106 | int rt_mutex_getprio(struct task_struct *task) | |
107 | { | |
108 | if (likely(!task_has_pi_waiters(task))) | |
109 | return task->normal_prio; | |
110 | ||
111 | return min(task_top_pi_waiter(task)->pi_list_entry.prio, | |
112 | task->normal_prio); | |
113 | } | |
114 | ||
115 | /* | |
116 | * Adjust the priority of a task, after its pi_waiters got modified. | |
117 | * | |
118 | * This can be both boosting and unboosting. task->pi_lock must be held. | |
119 | */ | |
bd197234 | 120 | static void __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(struct task_struct *task) |
23f78d4a IM |
121 | { |
122 | int prio = rt_mutex_getprio(task); | |
123 | ||
124 | if (task->prio != prio) | |
125 | rt_mutex_setprio(task, prio); | |
126 | } | |
127 | ||
128 | /* | |
129 | * Adjust task priority (undo boosting). Called from the exit path of | |
130 | * rt_mutex_slowunlock() and rt_mutex_slowlock(). | |
131 | * | |
132 | * (Note: We do this outside of the protection of lock->wait_lock to | |
133 | * allow the lock to be taken while or before we readjust the priority | |
134 | * of task. We do not use the spin_xx_mutex() variants here as we are | |
135 | * outside of the debug path.) | |
136 | */ | |
137 | static void rt_mutex_adjust_prio(struct task_struct *task) | |
138 | { | |
139 | unsigned long flags; | |
140 | ||
141 | spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags); | |
142 | __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task); | |
143 | spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags); | |
144 | } | |
145 | ||
146 | /* | |
147 | * Max number of times we'll walk the boosting chain: | |
148 | */ | |
149 | int max_lock_depth = 1024; | |
150 | ||
151 | /* | |
152 | * Adjust the priority chain. Also used for deadlock detection. | |
153 | * Decreases task's usage by one - may thus free the task. | |
154 | * Returns 0 or -EDEADLK. | |
155 | */ | |
bd197234 TG |
156 | static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task, |
157 | int deadlock_detect, | |
158 | struct rt_mutex *orig_lock, | |
159 | struct rt_mutex_waiter *orig_waiter, | |
160 | struct task_struct *top_task) | |
23f78d4a IM |
161 | { |
162 | struct rt_mutex *lock; | |
163 | struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter, *top_waiter = orig_waiter; | |
164 | int detect_deadlock, ret = 0, depth = 0; | |
165 | unsigned long flags; | |
166 | ||
167 | detect_deadlock = debug_rt_mutex_detect_deadlock(orig_waiter, | |
168 | deadlock_detect); | |
169 | ||
170 | /* | |
171 | * The (de)boosting is a step by step approach with a lot of | |
172 | * pitfalls. We want this to be preemptible and we want hold a | |
173 | * maximum of two locks per step. So we have to check | |
174 | * carefully whether things change under us. | |
175 | */ | |
176 | again: | |
177 | if (++depth > max_lock_depth) { | |
178 | static int prev_max; | |
179 | ||
180 | /* | |
181 | * Print this only once. If the admin changes the limit, | |
182 | * print a new message when reaching the limit again. | |
183 | */ | |
184 | if (prev_max != max_lock_depth) { | |
185 | prev_max = max_lock_depth; | |
186 | printk(KERN_WARNING "Maximum lock depth %d reached " | |
187 | "task: %s (%d)\n", max_lock_depth, | |
ba25f9dc | 188 | top_task->comm, task_pid_nr(top_task)); |
23f78d4a IM |
189 | } |
190 | put_task_struct(task); | |
191 | ||
192 | return deadlock_detect ? -EDEADLK : 0; | |
193 | } | |
194 | retry: | |
195 | /* | |
196 | * Task can not go away as we did a get_task() before ! | |
197 | */ | |
198 | spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags); | |
199 | ||
200 | waiter = task->pi_blocked_on; | |
201 | /* | |
202 | * Check whether the end of the boosting chain has been | |
203 | * reached or the state of the chain has changed while we | |
204 | * dropped the locks. | |
205 | */ | |
206 | if (!waiter || !waiter->task) | |
207 | goto out_unlock_pi; | |
208 | ||
1a539a87 TG |
209 | /* |
210 | * Check the orig_waiter state. After we dropped the locks, | |
211 | * the previous owner of the lock might have released the lock | |
212 | * and made us the pending owner: | |
213 | */ | |
214 | if (orig_waiter && !orig_waiter->task) | |
215 | goto out_unlock_pi; | |
216 | ||
217 | /* | |
218 | * Drop out, when the task has no waiters. Note, | |
219 | * top_waiter can be NULL, when we are in the deboosting | |
220 | * mode! | |
221 | */ | |
23f78d4a IM |
222 | if (top_waiter && (!task_has_pi_waiters(task) || |
223 | top_waiter != task_top_pi_waiter(task))) | |
224 | goto out_unlock_pi; | |
225 | ||
226 | /* | |
227 | * When deadlock detection is off then we check, if further | |
228 | * priority adjustment is necessary. | |
229 | */ | |
230 | if (!detect_deadlock && waiter->list_entry.prio == task->prio) | |
231 | goto out_unlock_pi; | |
232 | ||
233 | lock = waiter->lock; | |
234 | if (!spin_trylock(&lock->wait_lock)) { | |
235 | spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags); | |
236 | cpu_relax(); | |
237 | goto retry; | |
238 | } | |
239 | ||
240 | /* Deadlock detection */ | |
95e02ca9 | 241 | if (lock == orig_lock || rt_mutex_owner(lock) == top_task) { |
23f78d4a IM |
242 | debug_rt_mutex_deadlock(deadlock_detect, orig_waiter, lock); |
243 | spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock); | |
244 | ret = deadlock_detect ? -EDEADLK : 0; | |
245 | goto out_unlock_pi; | |
246 | } | |
247 | ||
248 | top_waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock); | |
249 | ||
250 | /* Requeue the waiter */ | |
251 | plist_del(&waiter->list_entry, &lock->wait_list); | |
252 | waiter->list_entry.prio = task->prio; | |
253 | plist_add(&waiter->list_entry, &lock->wait_list); | |
254 | ||
255 | /* Release the task */ | |
256 | spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags); | |
257 | put_task_struct(task); | |
258 | ||
259 | /* Grab the next task */ | |
260 | task = rt_mutex_owner(lock); | |
db630637 | 261 | get_task_struct(task); |
23f78d4a IM |
262 | spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags); |
263 | ||
264 | if (waiter == rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)) { | |
265 | /* Boost the owner */ | |
266 | plist_del(&top_waiter->pi_list_entry, &task->pi_waiters); | |
267 | waiter->pi_list_entry.prio = waiter->list_entry.prio; | |
268 | plist_add(&waiter->pi_list_entry, &task->pi_waiters); | |
269 | __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task); | |
270 | ||
271 | } else if (top_waiter == waiter) { | |
272 | /* Deboost the owner */ | |
273 | plist_del(&waiter->pi_list_entry, &task->pi_waiters); | |
274 | waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock); | |
275 | waiter->pi_list_entry.prio = waiter->list_entry.prio; | |
276 | plist_add(&waiter->pi_list_entry, &task->pi_waiters); | |
277 | __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task); | |
278 | } | |
279 | ||
23f78d4a IM |
280 | spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags); |
281 | ||
282 | top_waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock); | |
283 | spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock); | |
284 | ||
285 | if (!detect_deadlock && waiter != top_waiter) | |
286 | goto out_put_task; | |
287 | ||
288 | goto again; | |
289 | ||
290 | out_unlock_pi: | |
291 | spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags); | |
292 | out_put_task: | |
293 | put_task_struct(task); | |
36c8b586 | 294 | |
23f78d4a IM |
295 | return ret; |
296 | } | |
297 | ||
298 | /* | |
299 | * Optimization: check if we can steal the lock from the | |
300 | * assigned pending owner [which might not have taken the | |
301 | * lock yet]: | |
302 | */ | |
303 | static inline int try_to_steal_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock) | |
304 | { | |
305 | struct task_struct *pendowner = rt_mutex_owner(lock); | |
306 | struct rt_mutex_waiter *next; | |
307 | unsigned long flags; | |
308 | ||
309 | if (!rt_mutex_owner_pending(lock)) | |
310 | return 0; | |
311 | ||
312 | if (pendowner == current) | |
313 | return 1; | |
314 | ||
315 | spin_lock_irqsave(&pendowner->pi_lock, flags); | |
316 | if (current->prio >= pendowner->prio) { | |
317 | spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pendowner->pi_lock, flags); | |
318 | return 0; | |
319 | } | |
320 | ||
321 | /* | |
322 | * Check if a waiter is enqueued on the pending owners | |
323 | * pi_waiters list. Remove it and readjust pending owners | |
324 | * priority. | |
325 | */ | |
326 | if (likely(!rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock))) { | |
327 | spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pendowner->pi_lock, flags); | |
328 | return 1; | |
329 | } | |
330 | ||
331 | /* No chain handling, pending owner is not blocked on anything: */ | |
332 | next = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock); | |
333 | plist_del(&next->pi_list_entry, &pendowner->pi_waiters); | |
334 | __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(pendowner); | |
335 | spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pendowner->pi_lock, flags); | |
336 | ||
337 | /* | |
338 | * We are going to steal the lock and a waiter was | |
339 | * enqueued on the pending owners pi_waiters queue. So | |
340 | * we have to enqueue this waiter into | |
341 | * current->pi_waiters list. This covers the case, | |
342 | * where current is boosted because it holds another | |
343 | * lock and gets unboosted because the booster is | |
344 | * interrupted, so we would delay a waiter with higher | |
345 | * priority as current->normal_prio. | |
346 | * | |
347 | * Note: in the rare case of a SCHED_OTHER task changing | |
348 | * its priority and thus stealing the lock, next->task | |
349 | * might be current: | |
350 | */ | |
351 | if (likely(next->task != current)) { | |
352 | spin_lock_irqsave(¤t->pi_lock, flags); | |
353 | plist_add(&next->pi_list_entry, ¤t->pi_waiters); | |
354 | __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(current); | |
355 | spin_unlock_irqrestore(¤t->pi_lock, flags); | |
356 | } | |
357 | return 1; | |
358 | } | |
359 | ||
360 | /* | |
361 | * Try to take an rt-mutex | |
362 | * | |
363 | * This fails | |
364 | * - when the lock has a real owner | |
365 | * - when a different pending owner exists and has higher priority than current | |
366 | * | |
367 | * Must be called with lock->wait_lock held. | |
368 | */ | |
9a11b49a | 369 | static int try_to_take_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex *lock) |
23f78d4a IM |
370 | { |
371 | /* | |
372 | * We have to be careful here if the atomic speedups are | |
373 | * enabled, such that, when | |
374 | * - no other waiter is on the lock | |
375 | * - the lock has been released since we did the cmpxchg | |
376 | * the lock can be released or taken while we are doing the | |
377 | * checks and marking the lock with RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS. | |
378 | * | |
379 | * The atomic acquire/release aware variant of | |
380 | * mark_rt_mutex_waiters uses a cmpxchg loop. After setting | |
381 | * the WAITERS bit, the atomic release / acquire can not | |
382 | * happen anymore and lock->wait_lock protects us from the | |
383 | * non-atomic case. | |
384 | * | |
385 | * Note, that this might set lock->owner = | |
386 | * RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS in the case the lock is not contended | |
387 | * any more. This is fixed up when we take the ownership. | |
388 | * This is the transitional state explained at the top of this file. | |
389 | */ | |
390 | mark_rt_mutex_waiters(lock); | |
391 | ||
392 | if (rt_mutex_owner(lock) && !try_to_steal_lock(lock)) | |
393 | return 0; | |
394 | ||
395 | /* We got the lock. */ | |
9a11b49a | 396 | debug_rt_mutex_lock(lock); |
23f78d4a IM |
397 | |
398 | rt_mutex_set_owner(lock, current, 0); | |
399 | ||
400 | rt_mutex_deadlock_account_lock(lock, current); | |
401 | ||
402 | return 1; | |
403 | } | |
404 | ||
405 | /* | |
406 | * Task blocks on lock. | |
407 | * | |
408 | * Prepare waiter and propagate pi chain | |
409 | * | |
410 | * This must be called with lock->wait_lock held. | |
411 | */ | |
412 | static int task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex *lock, | |
413 | struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter, | |
9a11b49a | 414 | int detect_deadlock) |
23f78d4a | 415 | { |
36c8b586 | 416 | struct task_struct *owner = rt_mutex_owner(lock); |
23f78d4a | 417 | struct rt_mutex_waiter *top_waiter = waiter; |
23f78d4a | 418 | unsigned long flags; |
db630637 | 419 | int chain_walk = 0, res; |
23f78d4a IM |
420 | |
421 | spin_lock_irqsave(¤t->pi_lock, flags); | |
422 | __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(current); | |
423 | waiter->task = current; | |
424 | waiter->lock = lock; | |
425 | plist_node_init(&waiter->list_entry, current->prio); | |
426 | plist_node_init(&waiter->pi_list_entry, current->prio); | |
427 | ||
428 | /* Get the top priority waiter on the lock */ | |
429 | if (rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock)) | |
430 | top_waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock); | |
431 | plist_add(&waiter->list_entry, &lock->wait_list); | |
432 | ||
433 | current->pi_blocked_on = waiter; | |
434 | ||
435 | spin_unlock_irqrestore(¤t->pi_lock, flags); | |
436 | ||
437 | if (waiter == rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)) { | |
438 | spin_lock_irqsave(&owner->pi_lock, flags); | |
439 | plist_del(&top_waiter->pi_list_entry, &owner->pi_waiters); | |
440 | plist_add(&waiter->pi_list_entry, &owner->pi_waiters); | |
441 | ||
442 | __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(owner); | |
db630637 SR |
443 | if (owner->pi_blocked_on) |
444 | chain_walk = 1; | |
23f78d4a IM |
445 | spin_unlock_irqrestore(&owner->pi_lock, flags); |
446 | } | |
db630637 SR |
447 | else if (debug_rt_mutex_detect_deadlock(waiter, detect_deadlock)) |
448 | chain_walk = 1; | |
449 | ||
450 | if (!chain_walk) | |
23f78d4a IM |
451 | return 0; |
452 | ||
db630637 SR |
453 | /* |
454 | * The owner can't disappear while holding a lock, | |
455 | * so the owner struct is protected by wait_lock. | |
456 | * Gets dropped in rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain()! | |
457 | */ | |
458 | get_task_struct(owner); | |
459 | ||
23f78d4a IM |
460 | spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock); |
461 | ||
95e02ca9 | 462 | res = rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(owner, detect_deadlock, lock, waiter, |
9a11b49a | 463 | current); |
23f78d4a IM |
464 | |
465 | spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock); | |
466 | ||
467 | return res; | |
468 | } | |
469 | ||
470 | /* | |
471 | * Wake up the next waiter on the lock. | |
472 | * | |
473 | * Remove the top waiter from the current tasks waiter list and from | |
474 | * the lock waiter list. Set it as pending owner. Then wake it up. | |
475 | * | |
476 | * Called with lock->wait_lock held. | |
477 | */ | |
478 | static void wakeup_next_waiter(struct rt_mutex *lock) | |
479 | { | |
480 | struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter; | |
481 | struct task_struct *pendowner; | |
482 | unsigned long flags; | |
483 | ||
484 | spin_lock_irqsave(¤t->pi_lock, flags); | |
485 | ||
486 | waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock); | |
487 | plist_del(&waiter->list_entry, &lock->wait_list); | |
488 | ||
489 | /* | |
490 | * Remove it from current->pi_waiters. We do not adjust a | |
491 | * possible priority boost right now. We execute wakeup in the | |
492 | * boosted mode and go back to normal after releasing | |
493 | * lock->wait_lock. | |
494 | */ | |
495 | plist_del(&waiter->pi_list_entry, ¤t->pi_waiters); | |
496 | pendowner = waiter->task; | |
497 | waiter->task = NULL; | |
498 | ||
499 | rt_mutex_set_owner(lock, pendowner, RT_MUTEX_OWNER_PENDING); | |
500 | ||
501 | spin_unlock_irqrestore(¤t->pi_lock, flags); | |
502 | ||
503 | /* | |
504 | * Clear the pi_blocked_on variable and enqueue a possible | |
505 | * waiter into the pi_waiters list of the pending owner. This | |
506 | * prevents that in case the pending owner gets unboosted a | |
507 | * waiter with higher priority than pending-owner->normal_prio | |
508 | * is blocked on the unboosted (pending) owner. | |
509 | */ | |
510 | spin_lock_irqsave(&pendowner->pi_lock, flags); | |
511 | ||
512 | WARN_ON(!pendowner->pi_blocked_on); | |
513 | WARN_ON(pendowner->pi_blocked_on != waiter); | |
514 | WARN_ON(pendowner->pi_blocked_on->lock != lock); | |
515 | ||
516 | pendowner->pi_blocked_on = NULL; | |
517 | ||
518 | if (rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock)) { | |
519 | struct rt_mutex_waiter *next; | |
520 | ||
521 | next = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock); | |
522 | plist_add(&next->pi_list_entry, &pendowner->pi_waiters); | |
523 | } | |
524 | spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pendowner->pi_lock, flags); | |
525 | ||
526 | wake_up_process(pendowner); | |
527 | } | |
528 | ||
529 | /* | |
530 | * Remove a waiter from a lock | |
531 | * | |
532 | * Must be called with lock->wait_lock held | |
533 | */ | |
bd197234 TG |
534 | static void remove_waiter(struct rt_mutex *lock, |
535 | struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter) | |
23f78d4a IM |
536 | { |
537 | int first = (waiter == rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)); | |
36c8b586 | 538 | struct task_struct *owner = rt_mutex_owner(lock); |
23f78d4a | 539 | unsigned long flags; |
db630637 | 540 | int chain_walk = 0; |
23f78d4a IM |
541 | |
542 | spin_lock_irqsave(¤t->pi_lock, flags); | |
543 | plist_del(&waiter->list_entry, &lock->wait_list); | |
544 | waiter->task = NULL; | |
545 | current->pi_blocked_on = NULL; | |
546 | spin_unlock_irqrestore(¤t->pi_lock, flags); | |
547 | ||
548 | if (first && owner != current) { | |
549 | ||
550 | spin_lock_irqsave(&owner->pi_lock, flags); | |
551 | ||
552 | plist_del(&waiter->pi_list_entry, &owner->pi_waiters); | |
553 | ||
554 | if (rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock)) { | |
555 | struct rt_mutex_waiter *next; | |
556 | ||
557 | next = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock); | |
558 | plist_add(&next->pi_list_entry, &owner->pi_waiters); | |
559 | } | |
560 | __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(owner); | |
561 | ||
db630637 SR |
562 | if (owner->pi_blocked_on) |
563 | chain_walk = 1; | |
564 | ||
23f78d4a IM |
565 | spin_unlock_irqrestore(&owner->pi_lock, flags); |
566 | } | |
567 | ||
568 | WARN_ON(!plist_node_empty(&waiter->pi_list_entry)); | |
569 | ||
db630637 | 570 | if (!chain_walk) |
23f78d4a IM |
571 | return; |
572 | ||
db630637 SR |
573 | /* gets dropped in rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain()! */ |
574 | get_task_struct(owner); | |
575 | ||
23f78d4a IM |
576 | spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock); |
577 | ||
9a11b49a | 578 | rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(owner, 0, lock, NULL, current); |
23f78d4a IM |
579 | |
580 | spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock); | |
581 | } | |
582 | ||
95e02ca9 TG |
583 | /* |
584 | * Recheck the pi chain, in case we got a priority setting | |
585 | * | |
586 | * Called from sched_setscheduler | |
587 | */ | |
588 | void rt_mutex_adjust_pi(struct task_struct *task) | |
589 | { | |
590 | struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter; | |
591 | unsigned long flags; | |
592 | ||
593 | spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags); | |
594 | ||
595 | waiter = task->pi_blocked_on; | |
596 | if (!waiter || waiter->list_entry.prio == task->prio) { | |
597 | spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags); | |
598 | return; | |
599 | } | |
600 | ||
95e02ca9 TG |
601 | spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags); |
602 | ||
db630637 SR |
603 | /* gets dropped in rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain()! */ |
604 | get_task_struct(task); | |
9a11b49a | 605 | rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(task, 0, NULL, NULL, task); |
95e02ca9 TG |
606 | } |
607 | ||
23f78d4a IM |
608 | /* |
609 | * Slow path lock function: | |
610 | */ | |
611 | static int __sched | |
612 | rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state, | |
613 | struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout, | |
9a11b49a | 614 | int detect_deadlock) |
23f78d4a IM |
615 | { |
616 | struct rt_mutex_waiter waiter; | |
617 | int ret = 0; | |
618 | ||
619 | debug_rt_mutex_init_waiter(&waiter); | |
620 | waiter.task = NULL; | |
621 | ||
622 | spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock); | |
623 | ||
624 | /* Try to acquire the lock again: */ | |
9a11b49a | 625 | if (try_to_take_rt_mutex(lock)) { |
23f78d4a IM |
626 | spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock); |
627 | return 0; | |
628 | } | |
629 | ||
630 | set_current_state(state); | |
631 | ||
632 | /* Setup the timer, when timeout != NULL */ | |
720a2592 | 633 | if (unlikely(timeout)) { |
cc584b21 | 634 | hrtimer_start_expires(&timeout->timer, HRTIMER_MODE_ABS); |
720a2592 PZ |
635 | if (!hrtimer_active(&timeout->timer)) |
636 | timeout->task = NULL; | |
637 | } | |
23f78d4a IM |
638 | |
639 | for (;;) { | |
640 | /* Try to acquire the lock: */ | |
9a11b49a | 641 | if (try_to_take_rt_mutex(lock)) |
23f78d4a IM |
642 | break; |
643 | ||
644 | /* | |
645 | * TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE checks for signals and | |
646 | * timeout. Ignored otherwise. | |
647 | */ | |
648 | if (unlikely(state == TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE)) { | |
649 | /* Signal pending? */ | |
650 | if (signal_pending(current)) | |
651 | ret = -EINTR; | |
652 | if (timeout && !timeout->task) | |
653 | ret = -ETIMEDOUT; | |
654 | if (ret) | |
655 | break; | |
656 | } | |
657 | ||
658 | /* | |
659 | * waiter.task is NULL the first time we come here and | |
660 | * when we have been woken up by the previous owner | |
661 | * but the lock got stolen by a higher prio task. | |
662 | */ | |
663 | if (!waiter.task) { | |
664 | ret = task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(lock, &waiter, | |
9a11b49a | 665 | detect_deadlock); |
23f78d4a IM |
666 | /* |
667 | * If we got woken up by the owner then start loop | |
668 | * all over without going into schedule to try | |
669 | * to get the lock now: | |
670 | */ | |
c0d1d2bf TG |
671 | if (unlikely(!waiter.task)) { |
672 | /* | |
673 | * Reset the return value. We might | |
674 | * have returned with -EDEADLK and the | |
675 | * owner released the lock while we | |
676 | * were walking the pi chain. | |
677 | */ | |
678 | ret = 0; | |
23f78d4a | 679 | continue; |
c0d1d2bf | 680 | } |
23f78d4a IM |
681 | if (unlikely(ret)) |
682 | break; | |
683 | } | |
95e02ca9 | 684 | |
23f78d4a IM |
685 | spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock); |
686 | ||
687 | debug_rt_mutex_print_deadlock(&waiter); | |
688 | ||
61a87122 TG |
689 | if (waiter.task) |
690 | schedule_rt_mutex(lock); | |
23f78d4a IM |
691 | |
692 | spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock); | |
693 | set_current_state(state); | |
694 | } | |
695 | ||
696 | set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); | |
697 | ||
698 | if (unlikely(waiter.task)) | |
9a11b49a | 699 | remove_waiter(lock, &waiter); |
23f78d4a IM |
700 | |
701 | /* | |
702 | * try_to_take_rt_mutex() sets the waiter bit | |
703 | * unconditionally. We might have to fix that up. | |
704 | */ | |
705 | fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(lock); | |
706 | ||
707 | spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock); | |
708 | ||
709 | /* Remove pending timer: */ | |
710 | if (unlikely(timeout)) | |
711 | hrtimer_cancel(&timeout->timer); | |
712 | ||
713 | /* | |
714 | * Readjust priority, when we did not get the lock. We might | |
715 | * have been the pending owner and boosted. Since we did not | |
716 | * take the lock, the PI boost has to go. | |
717 | */ | |
718 | if (unlikely(ret)) | |
719 | rt_mutex_adjust_prio(current); | |
720 | ||
721 | debug_rt_mutex_free_waiter(&waiter); | |
722 | ||
723 | return ret; | |
724 | } | |
725 | ||
726 | /* | |
727 | * Slow path try-lock function: | |
728 | */ | |
729 | static inline int | |
9a11b49a | 730 | rt_mutex_slowtrylock(struct rt_mutex *lock) |
23f78d4a IM |
731 | { |
732 | int ret = 0; | |
733 | ||
734 | spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock); | |
735 | ||
736 | if (likely(rt_mutex_owner(lock) != current)) { | |
737 | ||
9a11b49a | 738 | ret = try_to_take_rt_mutex(lock); |
23f78d4a IM |
739 | /* |
740 | * try_to_take_rt_mutex() sets the lock waiters | |
741 | * bit unconditionally. Clean this up. | |
742 | */ | |
743 | fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(lock); | |
744 | } | |
745 | ||
746 | spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock); | |
747 | ||
748 | return ret; | |
749 | } | |
750 | ||
751 | /* | |
752 | * Slow path to release a rt-mutex: | |
753 | */ | |
754 | static void __sched | |
755 | rt_mutex_slowunlock(struct rt_mutex *lock) | |
756 | { | |
757 | spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock); | |
758 | ||
759 | debug_rt_mutex_unlock(lock); | |
760 | ||
761 | rt_mutex_deadlock_account_unlock(current); | |
762 | ||
763 | if (!rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock)) { | |
764 | lock->owner = NULL; | |
765 | spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock); | |
766 | return; | |
767 | } | |
768 | ||
769 | wakeup_next_waiter(lock); | |
770 | ||
771 | spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock); | |
772 | ||
773 | /* Undo pi boosting if necessary: */ | |
774 | rt_mutex_adjust_prio(current); | |
775 | } | |
776 | ||
777 | /* | |
778 | * debug aware fast / slowpath lock,trylock,unlock | |
779 | * | |
780 | * The atomic acquire/release ops are compiled away, when either the | |
781 | * architecture does not support cmpxchg or when debugging is enabled. | |
782 | */ | |
783 | static inline int | |
784 | rt_mutex_fastlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state, | |
785 | int detect_deadlock, | |
786 | int (*slowfn)(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state, | |
787 | struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout, | |
9a11b49a | 788 | int detect_deadlock)) |
23f78d4a IM |
789 | { |
790 | if (!detect_deadlock && likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg(lock, NULL, current))) { | |
791 | rt_mutex_deadlock_account_lock(lock, current); | |
792 | return 0; | |
793 | } else | |
9a11b49a | 794 | return slowfn(lock, state, NULL, detect_deadlock); |
23f78d4a IM |
795 | } |
796 | ||
797 | static inline int | |
798 | rt_mutex_timed_fastlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state, | |
799 | struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout, int detect_deadlock, | |
800 | int (*slowfn)(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state, | |
801 | struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout, | |
9a11b49a | 802 | int detect_deadlock)) |
23f78d4a IM |
803 | { |
804 | if (!detect_deadlock && likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg(lock, NULL, current))) { | |
805 | rt_mutex_deadlock_account_lock(lock, current); | |
806 | return 0; | |
807 | } else | |
9a11b49a | 808 | return slowfn(lock, state, timeout, detect_deadlock); |
23f78d4a IM |
809 | } |
810 | ||
811 | static inline int | |
812 | rt_mutex_fasttrylock(struct rt_mutex *lock, | |
9a11b49a | 813 | int (*slowfn)(struct rt_mutex *lock)) |
23f78d4a IM |
814 | { |
815 | if (likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg(lock, NULL, current))) { | |
816 | rt_mutex_deadlock_account_lock(lock, current); | |
817 | return 1; | |
818 | } | |
9a11b49a | 819 | return slowfn(lock); |
23f78d4a IM |
820 | } |
821 | ||
822 | static inline void | |
823 | rt_mutex_fastunlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, | |
824 | void (*slowfn)(struct rt_mutex *lock)) | |
825 | { | |
826 | if (likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg(lock, current, NULL))) | |
827 | rt_mutex_deadlock_account_unlock(current); | |
828 | else | |
829 | slowfn(lock); | |
830 | } | |
831 | ||
832 | /** | |
833 | * rt_mutex_lock - lock a rt_mutex | |
834 | * | |
835 | * @lock: the rt_mutex to be locked | |
836 | */ | |
837 | void __sched rt_mutex_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock) | |
838 | { | |
839 | might_sleep(); | |
840 | ||
841 | rt_mutex_fastlock(lock, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, 0, rt_mutex_slowlock); | |
842 | } | |
843 | EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_lock); | |
844 | ||
845 | /** | |
846 | * rt_mutex_lock_interruptible - lock a rt_mutex interruptible | |
847 | * | |
848 | * @lock: the rt_mutex to be locked | |
849 | * @detect_deadlock: deadlock detection on/off | |
850 | * | |
851 | * Returns: | |
852 | * 0 on success | |
853 | * -EINTR when interrupted by a signal | |
854 | * -EDEADLK when the lock would deadlock (when deadlock detection is on) | |
855 | */ | |
856 | int __sched rt_mutex_lock_interruptible(struct rt_mutex *lock, | |
857 | int detect_deadlock) | |
858 | { | |
859 | might_sleep(); | |
860 | ||
861 | return rt_mutex_fastlock(lock, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, | |
862 | detect_deadlock, rt_mutex_slowlock); | |
863 | } | |
864 | EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_lock_interruptible); | |
865 | ||
866 | /** | |
867 | * rt_mutex_lock_interruptible_ktime - lock a rt_mutex interruptible | |
868 | * the timeout structure is provided | |
869 | * by the caller | |
870 | * | |
871 | * @lock: the rt_mutex to be locked | |
872 | * @timeout: timeout structure or NULL (no timeout) | |
873 | * @detect_deadlock: deadlock detection on/off | |
874 | * | |
875 | * Returns: | |
876 | * 0 on success | |
877 | * -EINTR when interrupted by a signal | |
878 | * -ETIMEOUT when the timeout expired | |
879 | * -EDEADLK when the lock would deadlock (when deadlock detection is on) | |
880 | */ | |
881 | int | |
882 | rt_mutex_timed_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout, | |
883 | int detect_deadlock) | |
884 | { | |
885 | might_sleep(); | |
886 | ||
887 | return rt_mutex_timed_fastlock(lock, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, timeout, | |
888 | detect_deadlock, rt_mutex_slowlock); | |
889 | } | |
890 | EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_timed_lock); | |
891 | ||
892 | /** | |
893 | * rt_mutex_trylock - try to lock a rt_mutex | |
894 | * | |
895 | * @lock: the rt_mutex to be locked | |
896 | * | |
897 | * Returns 1 on success and 0 on contention | |
898 | */ | |
899 | int __sched rt_mutex_trylock(struct rt_mutex *lock) | |
900 | { | |
901 | return rt_mutex_fasttrylock(lock, rt_mutex_slowtrylock); | |
902 | } | |
903 | EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_trylock); | |
904 | ||
905 | /** | |
906 | * rt_mutex_unlock - unlock a rt_mutex | |
907 | * | |
908 | * @lock: the rt_mutex to be unlocked | |
909 | */ | |
910 | void __sched rt_mutex_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock) | |
911 | { | |
912 | rt_mutex_fastunlock(lock, rt_mutex_slowunlock); | |
913 | } | |
914 | EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_unlock); | |
915 | ||
916 | /*** | |
917 | * rt_mutex_destroy - mark a mutex unusable | |
918 | * @lock: the mutex to be destroyed | |
919 | * | |
920 | * This function marks the mutex uninitialized, and any subsequent | |
921 | * use of the mutex is forbidden. The mutex must not be locked when | |
922 | * this function is called. | |
923 | */ | |
924 | void rt_mutex_destroy(struct rt_mutex *lock) | |
925 | { | |
926 | WARN_ON(rt_mutex_is_locked(lock)); | |
927 | #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES | |
928 | lock->magic = NULL; | |
929 | #endif | |
930 | } | |
931 | ||
932 | EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_destroy); | |
933 | ||
934 | /** | |
935 | * __rt_mutex_init - initialize the rt lock | |
936 | * | |
937 | * @lock: the rt lock to be initialized | |
938 | * | |
939 | * Initialize the rt lock to unlocked state. | |
940 | * | |
941 | * Initializing of a locked rt lock is not allowed | |
942 | */ | |
943 | void __rt_mutex_init(struct rt_mutex *lock, const char *name) | |
944 | { | |
945 | lock->owner = NULL; | |
946 | spin_lock_init(&lock->wait_lock); | |
947 | plist_head_init(&lock->wait_list, &lock->wait_lock); | |
948 | ||
949 | debug_rt_mutex_init(lock, name); | |
950 | } | |
951 | EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__rt_mutex_init); | |
0cdbee99 IM |
952 | |
953 | /** | |
954 | * rt_mutex_init_proxy_locked - initialize and lock a rt_mutex on behalf of a | |
955 | * proxy owner | |
956 | * | |
957 | * @lock: the rt_mutex to be locked | |
958 | * @proxy_owner:the task to set as owner | |
959 | * | |
960 | * No locking. Caller has to do serializing itself | |
961 | * Special API call for PI-futex support | |
962 | */ | |
963 | void rt_mutex_init_proxy_locked(struct rt_mutex *lock, | |
964 | struct task_struct *proxy_owner) | |
965 | { | |
966 | __rt_mutex_init(lock, NULL); | |
9a11b49a | 967 | debug_rt_mutex_proxy_lock(lock, proxy_owner); |
0cdbee99 IM |
968 | rt_mutex_set_owner(lock, proxy_owner, 0); |
969 | rt_mutex_deadlock_account_lock(lock, proxy_owner); | |
970 | } | |
971 | ||
972 | /** | |
973 | * rt_mutex_proxy_unlock - release a lock on behalf of owner | |
974 | * | |
975 | * @lock: the rt_mutex to be locked | |
976 | * | |
977 | * No locking. Caller has to do serializing itself | |
978 | * Special API call for PI-futex support | |
979 | */ | |
980 | void rt_mutex_proxy_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, | |
981 | struct task_struct *proxy_owner) | |
982 | { | |
983 | debug_rt_mutex_proxy_unlock(lock); | |
984 | rt_mutex_set_owner(lock, NULL, 0); | |
985 | rt_mutex_deadlock_account_unlock(proxy_owner); | |
986 | } | |
987 | ||
988 | /** | |
989 | * rt_mutex_next_owner - return the next owner of the lock | |
990 | * | |
991 | * @lock: the rt lock query | |
992 | * | |
993 | * Returns the next owner of the lock or NULL | |
994 | * | |
995 | * Caller has to serialize against other accessors to the lock | |
996 | * itself. | |
997 | * | |
998 | * Special API call for PI-futex support | |
999 | */ | |
1000 | struct task_struct *rt_mutex_next_owner(struct rt_mutex *lock) | |
1001 | { | |
1002 | if (!rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock)) | |
1003 | return NULL; | |
1004 | ||
1005 | return rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)->task; | |
1006 | } |