From a772476349ba0faca67832f92a670d84762480f4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: jl777 <jameslee777@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2018 16:55:34 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] Test

---
 src/main.cpp  | 6 +++---
 src/miner.cpp | 9 +++++++--
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/main.cpp b/src/main.cpp
index 257b133ff..e85ca46c3 100644
--- a/src/main.cpp
+++ b/src/main.cpp
@@ -3544,7 +3544,7 @@ CBlockIndex* AddToBlockIndex(const CBlockHeader& block)
     BlockMap::iterator miPrev = mapBlockIndex.find(block.hashPrevBlock);
     if (it != mapBlockIndex.end())
     {
-        if ( ASSETCHAINS_STAKED == 0 || it->second != 0 ) // change behavior to allow komodo_ensure to work
+        if ( vNodes.size() < 4 || it->second != 0 ) // change behavior to allow komodo_ensure to work
         {
             // this is the strange case where somehow the hash is in the mapBlockIndex via as yet undetermined process, but the pindex for the hash is not there. Theoretically it is due to processing the block headers, but I have seen it get this case without having received it from the block headers or anywhere else... jl777
             //fprintf(stderr,"addtoblockindex already there %p\n",it->second);
@@ -3754,7 +3754,7 @@ bool CheckBlockHeader(int32_t height,CBlockIndex *pindex, const CBlockHeader& bl
     }
     if (blockhdr.GetBlockTime() > GetAdjustedTime() + 60)
         return state.Invalid(error("CheckBlockHeader(): block timestamp too far in the future"),REJECT_INVALID, "time-too-new");
-    else if ( ASSETCHAINS_STAKED != 0 && pindex != 0 && pindex->pprev != 0 && pindex->nTime <= pindex->pprev->nTime )
+    else if ( ASSETCHAINS_STAKED != 0 && pindex != 0 && pindex->pprev != 0 && pindex->nTime < pindex->pprev->nTime )
     {
         fprintf(stderr,"ht.%d %u vs ht.%d %u, is not monotonic\n",pindex->nHeight,pindex->nTime,pindex->pprev->nHeight,pindex->pprev->nTime);
         return state.Invalid(error("CheckBlockHeader(): block timestamp needs to always increase"),REJECT_INVALID, "time-too-new");
@@ -4155,7 +4155,7 @@ bool ProcessNewBlock(bool from_miner,int32_t height,CValidationState &state, CNo
         }
         // Store to disk
         CBlockIndex *pindex = NULL;
-        if ( ASSETCHAINS_STAKED != 0 ) // or other low node count networks
+        if ( vNodes.size() < 4 )
         {
             // without the komodo_ensure call, it is quite possible to get a non-error but null pindex returned from AcceptBlockHeader. In a 2 node network, it will be a long time before that block is reprocessed. Even though restarting makes it rescan, it seems much better to keep the nodes in sync
             komodo_ensure(pblock,hash);
diff --git a/src/miner.cpp b/src/miner.cpp
index c2a7bf1fd..ec40fb449 100644
--- a/src/miner.cpp
+++ b/src/miner.cpp
@@ -635,8 +635,9 @@ static bool ProcessBlockFound(CBlock* pblock)
         return error("KomodoMiner: ProcessNewBlock, block not accepted");
     
     TrackMinedBlock(pblock->GetHash());
-    if ( ASSETCHAINS_STAKED != 0 )
+    if ( vNodes.size() < 8 )
     {
+        int32_t n = 1;
         //fprintf(stderr,"broadcast new block t.%u\n",(uint32_t)time(NULL));
         {
             LOCK(cs_vNodes);
@@ -644,7 +645,11 @@ static bool ProcessBlockFound(CBlock* pblock)
             {
                 if ( pnode->hSocket == INVALID_SOCKET )
                     continue;
-                pnode->PushMessage("block", *pblock);
+                if ( (rand() % n) == 0 )
+                {
+                    pnode->PushMessage("block", *pblock);
+                    n++;
+                }
             }
         }
         //fprintf(stderr,"finished broadcast new block t.%u\n",(uint32_t)time(NULL));
-- 
2.42.0